Denver, CO - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SINGER Carson | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
2 | ASHBY Ethan J. | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% |
3 | SMITH David C. | - | - | - | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
3 | ERMAKOV Lev | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
5 | D'ORAZIO Joseph | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 15% |
6 | NOBLE Daniel | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
7 | FREYRE DE ANDRADE Elian R. | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
8 | HOUTZ Jackson | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
9 | LE Hayden | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% |
10 | POPE Nico | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% |
10 | NEUHEARDT Peter | 1% | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
12 | RABINKOV Anthony | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
13 | PORTMANN Stein J. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
14 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
15 | LI Joshua L. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 4% |
16 | GORTON George F. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
17 | XU Luke | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
18 | SCHERER Max | 8% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
19 | XU William | 3% | 18% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
20 | PITTS Connor | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
21 | GOERING Ashton H. | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
22 | KORINTH Alexander J. | 24% | 44% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
23 | WONG James T. | 33% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
24 | JACKSON Brady C. | 16% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
25 | REED Samuel J. | 26% | 43% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
26 | ESPARZA Hilario | 5% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
26 | LEITH Jack | 21% | 44% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
26 | BRISTOL Brijen | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.