Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PAN Qiwen | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 47% | 27% |
| 2 | SOLIKHOJIEV Akhmadillokhon | - | - | - | - | 7% | 37% | 56% |
| 3 | WENDLER Alexander J. | - | - | - | 4% | 26% | 53% | 17% |
| 3 | GOFF Nathaniel | - | - | 7% | 30% | 46% | 16% | 1% |
| 5 | MARÍN MANRÍQUEZ Ángel Fernando | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 47% |
| 6 | BI Ryan | - | - | 4% | 21% | 41% | 29% | 5% |
| 7 | LIU William | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 2% |
| 8 | YANG Andy H. | - | - | < 1% | 3% | 27% | 69% | |
| 9 | GUTH Joseph | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 44% | 29% |
| 10 | CHUANG Oscar | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 49% | 10% | |
| 11 | ZHONG Maxwell | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 14% | |
| 12 | QIU Zhaocheng | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 43% | 3% | |
| 13 | DINSAY Kristjan | - | - | - | 4% | 31% | 50% | 15% |
| 14 | CHAN Lik-heng Philip | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
| 15 | BORG Matthew | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 16 | DUNLAP Ezra | 7% | 29% | 41% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 17 | WONG Evan | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 7% | |
| 18 | ZHENG Alan H. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 34% | 62% |
| 19 | SHIH William | - | - | - | - | 10% | 89% | |
| 21 | UZGIRIS Kovas | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 20% | |
| 22 | GORDON William L. | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 22 | ROZALSKI Eli | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 24 | AGARWAL Savya | - | 15% | 41% | 33% | 10% | 1% | |
| 25 | LEHTINEN Axel | 13% | 38% | 36% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | ZHOU Ryan | 3% | 26% | 56% | 14% | |||
| 27 | DESAI Nalin H. | - | - | 5% | 26% | 47% | 21% | |
| 27 | CHOI Colin | 13% | 39% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 29 | ZHAN Kevin | - | 6% | 24% | 40% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 30 | SISINNI Leonardo | - | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 36% | 9% |
| 31 | ZHANG Jayden | 24% | 55% | 20% | 1% | |||
| 32 | DENG David | 17% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | ORNELAS Matteo | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 34 | WU Lucas | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 14% | |
| 35 | HERNANDEZ BERRON Salvador | 3% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 7% | - | |
| 36 | LEE Christopher | 52% | 40% | 7% | - | |||
| 37 | ANDRADE Cedric | 28% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
| 38 | NISHIHIRA Tyler | 7% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 39 | LEONG Wilson Hua | 4% | 22% | 41% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 40 | CHANG Nathan | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | SUMIN Yang | - | 4% | 25% | 46% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 42 | GUO Joey | 19% | 44% | 30% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 43 | MIRON Ioachim | 5% | 25% | 43% | 25% | 3% | - | - |
| 44 | LUK Trusten | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 45 | JUNCO Carlos | - | 3% | 29% | 67% | |||
| 46 | LEE Seungwon | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 44% | 23% |
| 47 | ZHANG Raphael | 1% | 20% | 47% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 48 | MANIKTALA Suvir | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 49 | GEARHART Andrew (Andy) R. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 50% | 32% | 4% |
| 50 | LI Austin | 29% | 45% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 51 | ARCARA Evan | 28% | 45% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 52 | SCHIENEMAN Valentine | 2% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% | - | |
| 53 | BHANOT Arjun | 40% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 55 | GUDIMETLA Siddhanth | 3% | 41% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 56 | ZHANG Andrew | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 57 | LEE David S. | 3% | 18% | 41% | 32% | 6% | - | - |
| 58 | PE Noah | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 59 | CHENG Norman | 3% | 44% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 60 | FOY Grant | 18% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 61 | VAN Tyson | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 62 | HINTZ Rayan | 88% | 11% | - | - | - | - | |
| 63 | FU Owen | 24% | 46% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 64 | KUZMAK Michael J. | 2% | 15% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
| 65 | HAMEL Gillian | 90% | 9% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.