Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | AHMAD Uzayr | V V V V V | V V V V V | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 2 | SUN Nathan | V V V V D | V V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 3 | KERSHA Alexander | V V V V D | V V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 3 | QIAN Zekai | V V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 5 | ZHANG Aaron | V V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 6 | ZHONG Kingsley | V V D V | V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 7 | MANCHALA Vedanth | V V D D | V V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 8 | BU Ethan | D V V D D | V V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 9 | GOLI Arush | V V V V D | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 10 | BRILLANTES Luke | V V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 11 | FANG Ryan | V V D V V | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 12 | ZHENG Vincent | V D V V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 13 | DAWSON Myer | V D V D V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 14 | LU Ethan | V D V D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 15 | ZHAO David | V D D V V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 16 | JOHNSON Daniel | D D V V | V D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 17 | MASON Frederick | V D V V V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 18 | CUI Mason | V V V D | D | 0.6 | 3 | +2.4 |
| 19 | ROTONDO Max | D V V D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 20 | ZHANG Eric | V V D D V | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 21 | DENG Jonathan | D V V D V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 22 | WULIN Nicholas | V V D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 23 | SHINDE Aksh | D D V V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 24 | BHOSREKAR Som | D D V V | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 25 | WOODWORTH Desmond | D V D V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 26 | KOEFERL Miles | D D V V D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 27 | LECH Landon | D V D D V | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 28 | NG Deacon | D D D V V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 29 | DAVE Neil | V D D V D | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 30 | BORGES Julien | V D D D | V D | 3.3 | 1 | -2.3 |
| 31 | MACCIOLI Daniel | D D D V D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 32 | WONG Maxwell | D D D D D | V D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 33 | HUANG Alec | D V D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 34 | CHEUNG Gio | D D V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 35 | ZHAO Pinzheng | D D D D | D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 |
| 36 | CASSIE Charles | D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 37 | CONNELLY Malcolm | D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 38 | DENECKE-SPAKOVSZKY Simon | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 39 | HASSETT Edward | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.