Caribe Royale Orlando - Orlando, FL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHENG Annalyn | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 37% |
| 2 | MALIK Manha | - | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 47% | 7% |
| 3 | DESAI Zoya | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% | |
| 3 | CUSTODIO SAMANTHA | - | - | - | - | 2% | 23% | 74% |
| 5 | FRASER Morgan | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% |
| 6 | SHEN Gloria | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% | |
| 7 | WEN Cynthia | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
| 8 | ZHANG Hannah | - | 1% | 16% | 44% | 33% | 6% | |
| 9 | KHETPAL Aalia | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
| 10 | LIN Avery | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 4% |
| 11 | ENRIQUEZ Bianca Perla | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% | |
| 12 | SON Ayoung | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 53% | |
| 13 | ZHANG Priscilla | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 20% | |
| 14 | FENG Claire | - | - | 9% | 38% | 42% | 11% | |
| 15 | LI Annabelle | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
| 16 | ELLISON Ingrid | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 17 | MA Sophia | - | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | |
| 18 | FENG Christy | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 19 | CHEN Aimee | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 20 | KIM Lael | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 21 | DEJOY Leilah | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 22 | MILLER Anna | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 23 | SHTEPA Sofia | 3% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 24 | CHEN Chloe | 59% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 25 | VO Evelyn | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
| 26 | DING Jessica | 1% | 10% | 46% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
| 27 | LAM Dorris Yandor | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 3% | |
| 28 | DING Jennifer | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 29 | SHAOOLIAN Alexa | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% | |
| 30 | JONES Parker | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 31 | HUANG Gabrielle | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | |
| 32 | KLIVANS Gwyneth | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | PARK Hannah | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 40% | 13% | - |
| 34 | JU Victoria | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 35 | SUN Zoey | 35% | 53% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 36 | SHI Cathy | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 37 | TUNG Alison | 26% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | DE LA FUENTE Victoria | - | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 39 | LEE Isabella | 12% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | CHIES Julia | < 1% | 1% | 5% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
| 41 | MORONES Alieza | 37% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 42 | KHARUTSKAYA Diana | 6% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 43 | CAMELLINI Emily | 47% | 45% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 44 | MCGAHAN Adley | 68% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 44 | BOWMAN Elsie | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.