Caribe Royale Orlando - Orlando, FL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHANG Nikki | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% |
| 2 | STETSIV Julia | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 39% |
| 3 | MACHIRAJU Ishita | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% |
| 3 | SON Ellie | 4% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 4% | - |
| 5 | DANIELS Jordanna | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% |
| 6 | VARAH Alaia | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% | ||
| 7 | LI Gloria | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% | |
| 8 | YU Sydney | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% | |
| 9 | CHEN Chloe | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
| 10 | KABILING Anika Von Marie | - | - | 4% | 23% | 46% | 24% | 2% |
| 11 | VU Claire | 15% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 1% | ||
| 12 | LIANG Katherine | 1% | 9% | 24% | 32% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 13 | JIN Eileen | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 14 | NORRIS Phoebe | 4% | 21% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 15 | YAO Elizabeth | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | ||
| 16 | ARGUELLO Camilla | 1% | 8% | 23% | 32% | 25% | 10% | 1% |
| 17 | YANG Felicia | - | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 37% | 21% |
| 18 | GARCIA RODRIGUEZ Victoria Maria | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 19 | PARRA Luciana | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 20 | GUERVILLE Angelique | 3% | 17% | 38% | 34% | 9% | ||
| 21 | LIU Alyssa | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
| 22 | PURITZ Morgan | 3% | 20% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 23 | ARANGO Ivanna | 7% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 24 | HA Emmalene | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 9% | |
| 25 | JEON Karis | 18% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 26 | ZHANG Elyna | 17% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | KONDE Anika | 3% | 13% | 28% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 28 | RADELL Zoe | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 29 | MCGAHAN Avery | 21% | 43% | 29% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 30 | CHANG Eleanor | 7% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 3% | ||
| 31 | ONG Katherine | 1% | 8% | 22% | 32% | 25% | 10% | 1% |
| 32 | WANG ZOE | 13% | 38% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | SHANG Skye | 21% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | HOPKINS McKenzie | 32% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 36 | WU Eilene | 8% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 37 | SHAIKH Sarah | 8% | 36% | 38% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 38 | MALAGÓN OSORIO Catalina | - | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 39 | HE JESSICA | - | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 40 | CRUZ Lala | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.