MSA Fieldhouse - GRAND RAPIDS, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | AADHI Hansika | - | - | 1% | 10% | 45% | 44% | |
| 2 | CULLIVAN Sienna | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% |
| 3 | ZOLDAN Gweniveve A. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 28% |
| 3 | HU Sophie | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 5 | MUMMANENI Samyuta | - | - | 2% | 18% | 51% | 28% | |
| 6 | HOROWITZ Shuli | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% |
| 7 | HARRIS Parker | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
| 8 | BOIKE Lucille | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 43% | 18% |
| 9 | HUSSIAN Annabelle | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 10 | SALMI-BYDALEK Ada | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 11 | SUN Nicole | - | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 12 | HUANG Natalie | - | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 7% |
| 13 | OS Danielle | - | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 7% |
| 14 | MORSE Katherine | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
| 15 | KNAPP Isabella | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% |
| 16 | LIN Kenzie | - | - | 5% | 24% | 41% | 24% | 4% |
| 17 | CHOI JULIE | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 18 | SONG Erin | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 19 | YARLAGADDA Smaya | 20% | 48% | 27% | 5% | < 1% | - | - |
| 20 | BELL Blake | 34% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 21 | DIRKES Catherine | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 22 | FECHER Lily | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 23 | CHUNG Stella | - | 2% | 16% | 40% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 24 | KASHUBA Mila | 1% | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 25 | BLAKEY Heaven | - | 6% | 30% | 46% | 16% | 2% | |
| 26 | KIM Yuna | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 27 | LEGGETT Emilia | 1% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 28 | KOSCIK-AQUINO Emily | 9% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 29 | LIN Aria | 45% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 30 | LIN Athena | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | ZHOU Jolena | 39% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 32 | KHAN Leena | 2% | 19% | 47% | 28% | 4% | - | |
| 33 | YU Angela | 5% | 37% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 34 | SAMALA Reese | - | 10% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 35 | NEPAL Noukou Asha | 34% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 36 | NAFSOU Ava | - | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 37 | KRONZER Sophia | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 38 | WOERTER Therese-Margaret | 3% | 21% | 44% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 39 | UTIN Alexandra | 8% | 32% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 40 | PHUNG Caitlin | 89% | 11% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 41 | KU Amanda | 74% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.