Caribe Royale Orlando - Orlando, FL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KAUL Tara | - | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 67% |
| 2 | VUDTHITHAMRONG Vivienne | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% | |
| 3 | YADAV Tishya | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% |
| 3 | HEATH Isabella | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
| 5 | PEREIRA Izumi | - | 3% | 21% | 45% | 31% | ||
| 5 | STETSIV Julia | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 29% | |
| 7 | YANG Felicia | - | - | 6% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 5% |
| 8 | ZHANG angelina | - | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 6% |
| 9 | MACHIRAJU Ishita | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 19% | |
| 10 | SON Ellie | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 11 | TOPALOV Julia | - | - | 3% | 16% | 39% | 36% | 6% |
| 12 | DANIELS Jordanna | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% |
| 13 | LIU Alyssa | 1% | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 14 | ZHANG Nikki | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 41% | 14% | |
| 15 | DEMRY Kylee | 1% | 9% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 16 | POWERS Waverly | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 6% | |
| 17 | YU Sydney | - | 4% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 18 | ROSTHOLDER Hannah | - | 8% | 33% | 43% | 16% | ||
| 19 | VARAH Alaia | 1% | 11% | 38% | 39% | 11% | ||
| 20 | ONG Katherine | 1% | 11% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 2% | |
| 21 | ARGUELLO Camilla | 1% | 12% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
| 22 | GARCIA RODRIGUEZ Victoria Maria | 3% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 2% | |
| 23 | GUERVILLE Angelique | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 24 | CHEN Chloe | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
| 25 | DESAI Sabrina | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
| 26 | PARRA Luciana | 18% | 49% | 27% | 5% | - | ||
| 27 | KABILING Anika Von Marie | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
| 28 | ELLINGWOOD Sophia | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
| 29 | VU Claire | 2% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 30 | MCCARTHY Nora Louisa Abrous | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 14% | 1% |
| 31 | LIU Teresa | - | 3% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 32 | PURITZ Morgan | 51% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | ||
| 33 | ARANGO Ivanna | 22% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | LIANG Katherine | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 35 | HAROYAN Lilit | 52% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 36 | KONDE Anika | 12% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 37 | YAO Elizabeth | 9% | 39% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 38 | JEON Kristen | 16% | 43% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | HOPKINS McKenzie | 56% | 37% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 40 | JONES Greta | 31% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | WU Eilene | 56% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 43 | KHAN AALIYAH | 10% | 38% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | MCALISTER Charlotte | 40% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 45 | NORRIS Phoebe | 16% | 49% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.