Caribe Royale Orlando - Orlando, FL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MCFARLANE Asha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% |
| 2 | LAI Miranda | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 10% |
| 3 | NWODO Naila | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% |
| 3 | DAI Iris Yuyang | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 19% |
| 5 | MCSHERRY Kayla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 65% |
| 6 | DESAI Zoya | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 9% | 1% |
| 7 | KHETPAL Aalia | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 3% | |
| 8 | ZHENG Annalyn | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 8% | |
| 9 | SON Ayoung | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 11% |
| 10 | SHAOOLIAN Maya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% |
| 11 | SHEN Gloria | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 15% | |
| 12 | VENZON Makena Jane | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 4% |
| 13 | KIM Lael | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
| 14 | GOITIA Genevieve | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 15 | FRASER Morgan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 19% |
| 16 | MAGALLANES GABRIELA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 38% |
| 17 | KUTATELADZE Anna | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% | |
| 18 | RIVERA Leahy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 19% | |
| 19 | MALIK Manha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 5% |
| 20 | ZHANG Hannah | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 21 | PANDIT Leela | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 22 | LIN Katherine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 23 | CHOI Cara | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
| 24 | ENRIQUEZ Bianca Perla | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | |
| 25 | VO Evelyn | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 26 | KUANG Bella | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 27 | HUANG Gabrielle | 100% | 89% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 28 | MA Sophia | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% | |
| 29 | WEN Cynthia | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | |
| 30 | FENG Claire | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 31 | ZHANG Priscilla | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 32 | CUSTODIO SAMANTHA | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 25% | 4% |
| 33 | SHANG Arianna | 100% | 99% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% | |
| 34 | EPSTEIN Naomi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% |
| 35 | WU Charlotte | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 36 | ZOLDAN Nolabelle | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 37 | LAM Dorris Yandor | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 38 | DING Jennifer | 100% | 94% | 63% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 39 | LI Annabelle | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 40 | ACERBI-SAVLOFF Emma | 100% | 85% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | LIN Avery | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 42 | CHEN Aimee | 100% | 92% | 59% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 43 | PARK Hannah | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 36% | 7% | - |
| 44 | ELLISON Ingrid | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 45 | DEJOY Leilah | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 46 | TANG Clementine | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 47 | FENG Christy | 100% | 88% | 50% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | SHAOOLIAN Alexa | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 49 | KLIVANS Gwyneth | 100% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 50 | SHTEPA Sofia | 100% | 66% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | CHIES Julia | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 52 | KHARUTSKAYA Diana | 100% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 53 | TEPLOVA Elizabeth | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 54 | KAGAN Natalie | 100% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.