NYFA Brooklyn - Brooklyn, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | MOKRETSOV Leah | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% |
| 2 | LAI Jayden | - | - | 6% | 28% | 48% | 18% |
| 3 | MASKIN Mikhail | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
| 3 | CHEN Madeline | - | - | 6% | 26% | 44% | 24% |
| 5 | FANG Charlie | - | 2% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 10% |
| 6 | CHIANG William | - | - | 5% | 22% | 44% | 28% |
| 7 | TANG Jayce | 2% | 21% | 41% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 8 | GURTIN Aleksandra | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 9 | VILLER Alice | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 27% |
| 10 | SIU Mila | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 5% |
| 11 | GUJJA Rishabh | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 43% | 14% |
| 12 | LAI Jaxon | - | 13% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 1% |
| 13 | KUO Stella | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 14 | KAMENSKY Emilia | 2% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 15 | NEMAT Kamila | 4% | 29% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 16 | GOOD Adam | 34% | 50% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
| 17 | YANG Julian | 6% | 32% | 44% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 18 | LU Shawn | - | - | 1% | 13% | 56% | 31% |
| 19 | LIU Frederick | - | 5% | 24% | 45% | 24% | 2% |
| 20 | CHEN Samuel | 13% | 41% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 21 | HWANG Chase | 4% | 24% | 43% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 22 | CHEUNG Daniel | - | 6% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 4% |
| 23 | SALIBA Jackson | 1% | 10% | 32% | 39% | 16% | 2% |
| 23 | PENG Leo | 1% | 12% | 38% | 36% | 12% | 1% |
| 25 | TUTELMAN Shon | 33% | 46% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 26 | SALIBA Madison | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 27 | CHOI Yerin | 2% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 2% |
| 28 | CHOI Serine | 48% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 29 | CHERNYAK Abigail | 53% | 40% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 30 | LEUNG Hayden | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.