Savage Fencing Club - Savage, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | ||
| 1 | CARTER Austin L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 66% | 33% | 8% |
| 2 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% | ||
| 3 | O'DOWD Andrew J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 82% | 54% | 23% | 4% |
| 3 | CHRISTY Peter C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% | ||
| 5 | BEREKNYEI Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 10% | |
| 6 | MARKOWITZ William M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 20% | 1% | ||
| 7 | YAKIMENKO Andrei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% | |
| 8 | LAWLOR Lee | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 2% | ||
| 9 | MEGGERS Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 41% | 9% | 1% | |
| 10 | HUGHES Michael D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 82% | 56% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 11 | GALEOTTI Loriano | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% | |
| 12 | PATTERSON Malcolm (Werewolf) D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 8% | ||
| 13 | ROUSE Joseph (Joe) T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 27% | 2% | ||
| 14 | DELONG Mike | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | 54% | 15% | 1% | ||
| 15 | LEHFELDT Damien S. Missing ID | |||||||||
| 16 | KONG Qingjun | 100% | 96% | 72% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | ||
| 17 | COLETTA David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 60% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 18 | NEMAZIE David A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 91% | 71% | 41% | 15% | 2% |
| 19 | SWICK Kerry J. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | ||
| 20 | MOORE Guy L. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 21 | GRAVEMAN William Missing ID | |||||||||
| 22 | HUEY Curtis E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% | ||
| 23 | MILLIGAN Lauren M. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | CAMPBELL Paul | 100% | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | ||
| 25 | SAMPAIO Beatriz | 100% | 50% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - | - | |
| 26 | BOWDEN Nancy | 100% | 93% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 27 | KREMPASKY John H. | 100% | 100% | 88% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 28 | WIESSLER-HUGHES Linda | 100% | 98% | 58% | 10% | 1% | - | - | ||
| 29 | RUSEN Gary V. | 100% | 84% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 30 | STARKWEATHER Jeff | 100% | 77% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 31 | MILLIGAN Bruce C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 32 | NESTERUK Hope | 100% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | - | ||
| 33 | FONS Jennifer | 100% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | - | ||
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.