Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GONG Hai | - | - | - | - | 2% | 19% | 80% |
| 2 | MURPHY Genevieve | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 41% | 49% |
| 3 | LUO lucy | - | - | 6% | 25% | 44% | 25% | |
| 3 | ZHU Alivia | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 44% | 22% | |
| 5 | LIN Zhishan | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 38% |
| 6 | ZHILKOV Anya | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 45% | 35% |
| 7 | XING Melly | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 42% |
| 8 | GENG Emma | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% | |
| 9 | YARBILOVA Fasikhat | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 10 | ZHENG Annalyn | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 47% | 24% |
| 11 | BYK Karalina | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 43% | 44% |
| 12 | WANG Joann | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 49% | 23% |
| 13 | GE Deanna | - | - | 1% | 6% | 28% | 48% | 18% |
| 14 | ELLISON Ingrid | - | - | 4% | 18% | 39% | 35% | 4% |
| 15 | ZHU Audrey | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 16 | PAEK Ellie | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 13% | 1% |
| 17 | YAN Miduo Elena | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 18 | DONG Audrey | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 19 | HEMPHILL Mia | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 20 | MCCLAIN Madison | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 21 | KOESTERS Cecilie | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 4% |
| 22 | JAZWINSKI Ivy | - | 4% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 6% | |
| 23 | LIANG Jasmine | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
| 24 | KIM Lael | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% | |
| 25 | CHEN Sophie | 6% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 26 | DOMINIK Eliana | 1% | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 27 | WEN Lillian | 2% | 18% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
| 28 | JIN Emily | 7% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 29 | JU Victoria | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 30 | MCCLAIN Grayce | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 31 | LI Doreen | 4% | 19% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 32 | CLOUD Chrystie | 18% | 45% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | ZELDIN Nina | 8% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 34 | WANG Christina | 1% | 6% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 35 | MA Cloris | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 35 | MILLER Anna | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% | 2% |
| 37 | LEE Annabel | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
| 38 | GOMEZ Amelia | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 39 | ZHU Alicia | 7% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 40 | CLOUD Cailynn | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | KIRBY Emelie | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 42 | NIVAS Tvisha | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 43 | LU Sophia | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 44 | ROBERTSON Caroline | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 45 | WANG Michelle | 3% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 46 | ELNAGGAR lea | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
| 47 | CHIN Harper | 32% | 42% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | CHOUDRY Charlotte | 35% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 49 | PATEL Tiana | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 50 | MEHTA Zara | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
| 51 | LEVITE Lilliana | 8% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 52 | POONIA Akira | 44% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 53 | BRAVEBOY Shania | 10% | 36% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | CHEN Aria | 17% | 43% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.