Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZELDIN Nadia | - | - | 1% | 11% | 54% | 34% | |
| 2 | CASCONE Emily | - | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 83% |
| 3 | JOO Natalie | - | - | - | - | 2% | 23% | 75% |
| 3 | ORBE-AUSTIN Nia | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% |
| 5 | WANG Amabel | - | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 75% |
| 6 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% | |
| 7 | HUANG Sophie | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 17% | |
| 8 | SFINTESCU Emma | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 2% |
| 9 | LI Joy | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% |
| 10 | JIANG Chloe | - | - | 5% | 28% | 46% | 20% | |
| 11 | JOO Sara | - | - | 1% | 11% | 52% | 36% | |
| 12 | MCFARLANE Asha | - | - | - | 6% | 44% | 50% | |
| 13 | CAO Amelie | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% | |
| 14 | ORBÉ-AUSTIN Maya | - | 2% | 18% | 45% | 30% | 6% | |
| 15 | DE CASTRO Kai | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 34% | 4% |
| 16 | MA Emily(Yiming) | - | 6% | 26% | 41% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 17 | LI savannah | - | - | 2% | 17% | 55% | 27% | |
| 17 | STEWART Isla | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | < 1% | |
| 19 | WU Maggie Lei | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 4% |
| 20 | BAULIN Zoya | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 21 | BERGEL Daphne | - | - | - | 7% | 41% | 52% | |
| 22 | KRAHE Annika | - | - | 1% | 9% | 47% | 43% | |
| 23 | HAO Danica | - | - | 2% | 16% | 45% | 37% | |
| 24 | LUO lucy | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 40% | 17% | 1% |
| 25 | CHUNG Stella | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 26 | KOESTERS Florentine | 1% | 14% | 40% | 35% | 9% | - | |
| 27 | SHIN Elizabeth | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 41% | |
| 28 | MAIA ZUCKERMAN Julia | 2% | 15% | 39% | 37% | 7% | - | |
| 29 | SUN Erin | 4% | 23% | 42% | 28% | 3% | - | |
| 30 | LEO Jenna | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 32% | 9% | - |
| 31 | BYK Karalina | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 23% | 2% |
| 32 | CLARK Lillian | 29% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | REZA Fukaina | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 31% | 4% |
| 34 | ZINITI-LAU Elena | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 35 | KIM Claire | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 36 | LIN Katherine | - | 1% | 12% | 37% | 42% | 8% | |
| 37 | PELLE Lia | 2% | 18% | 41% | 31% | 7% | - | |
| 38 | WAN Celine | - | 5% | 36% | 46% | 12% | 1% | |
| 39 | ZHU Ella | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 40 | DINAR Julia | 6% | 31% | 41% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 41 | GOODMAN Carden | - | 6% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 42 | YOUM Amelia | 2% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 43 | PEVZNER Sophia | 1% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 44 | CAVANAGH Emma | 4% | 27% | 42% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 45 | COLE Sofia | - | 4% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 5% | |
| 46 | HOLLIS Priscillia | 7% | 35% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 47 | VACCARO Lillian | 4% | 25% | 45% | 23% | 3% | - | |
| 48 | PAEK Mila | 31% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 48 | IRWIN Juliet | 31% | 57% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 50 | ZHENG Annalyn | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 33% | 8% | |
| 51 | JANSSEN Juliane | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | - |
| 52 | JUNCADELLA Lucy | 6% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 53 | MURPHY Genevieve | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 54 | POLING Katherine | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | - |
| 55 | GOMEZ Sofia | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | CHAN Kaitlyn | - | 8% | 45% | 39% | 7% | - | |
| 56 | LEZHANSKY Alexis | 24% | 58% | 16% | 1% | - | - | |
| 58 | SHUTZER Lily | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
| 59 | SONG Sarah | 61% | 36% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 60 | LIU Caydence | 1% | 10% | 47% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
| 61 | HUDSON Sophie | 21% | 45% | 28% | 6% | - | - | |
| 62 | ZHANG Caroline | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 63 | KANDALAFT Emma | 6% | 30% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 64 | JOHNSON Elizabeth | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 65 | ALDREDGE Ginny Rebecca | 53% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 66 | RUSTOGI Jyoti | 31% | 45% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 67 | COUAILLIER Lou | 8% | 32% | 41% | 18% | 1% | - | |
| 68 | HOU Xu | 2% | 25% | 43% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 69 | SICHEL-OUTCALT Margaret | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 70 | ALBRECHT-SMITH Anne | 5% | 33% | 41% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 71 | BEKIYANTS Elizabeth | 10% | 36% | 39% | 14% | 1% | - | |
| 72 | YANG Chloe | 8% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 73 | MCCLELLAN Florence | 55% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 74 | KUI Ava | 52% | 41% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 75 | LENZ Phoebe | 37% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 75 | LOBO Sophie | 71% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 77 | HWANG Olivia | 2% | 17% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.