Thousand Oaks, CA - Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YUN Jaesun | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 2 | WANG Eric Y. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% | |
| 3 | LEE Christopher M. | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
| 3 | AVAKIAN Alec | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | |
| 5 | ZUBATIY Samuel | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 23% | |
| 6 | LO Konnor | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
| 7 | CHAN Aidan | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 8 | PATIL Aaryan A. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% | |
| 9 | QIU Nathan | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% | |
| 10 | GIANETTO Ethan K. | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% | |
| 11 | ANDRES Michael | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 12 | KIM Benjamin | - | 5% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 13 | CHOW William T. | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 14 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 15 | KIM Maxwell J. | 1% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
| 16 | GUO Ethan | 4% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 17 | GAINES Isaac M. | 2% | 10% | 24% | 32% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 18 | LINDSEY Aiden | 3% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 19 | KUMAR Sachit | 8% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 20 | BYON Julian | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 21 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 7% | - | |
| 22 | LIN Oliver | 4% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 23 | LIM William J. | 4% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 4% | - |
| 24 | BYON Adrian | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | GILSHTEYN Jacob | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.