The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

American Challenge RYC/RCC all Youth Events and Cadet Only Events

Y-14 Men's Saber

Saturday, March 30, 2019 at 11:00 AM

Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 MORRILL Justin 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 76% 31%
2 ALTIRS Alexander 100% 100% 96% 78% 44% 13% 1%
3 WILSON Jude 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 52%
3 SO Hananiah 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 45%
5 LEMPERT Levy A. 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 68% 23%
6 LIU Kelly 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 57% 14%
7 COLE Alexander 100% 100% 100% 98% 83% 42% 8%
8 SPOSATO Andrew P. 100% 84% 46% 15% 3% - -
9 CHAN Matthew 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 43%
10 TRUDNOS Allen 100% 100% 96% 80% 47% 13%
11 DA GRACA Aidan 100% 100% 97% 82% 42% 7%
12 MYLEK Peter 100% 99% 90% 58% 19% 2%
13 SKINNER Graham B. 100% 100% 99% 90% 57% 14%
14 LUKASHENKO Darii 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 62%
15 BUCHMANN Finn D. 100% 100% 100% 98% 89% 60% 21%
16 KIM Shaun M. 100% 99% 92% 68% 33% 7%
17 CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 44%
18 HONG Vincent Q. 100% 99% 91% 68% 34% 10% 1%
19 WU Wilmund 100% 100% 96% 77% 40% 10% 1%
20 KEEFE Duncan 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 69% 25%
21 HUANG Ethan F. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 45%
22 ROBERTS Justin C. 100% 100% 99% 90% 64% 27% 4%
23 GOLD Jackson 100% 100% 93% 57% 16% 2%
24 SHOMAN Zachary 100% 100% 97% 84% 53% 16%
25 ELIN Adam E. 100% 99% 85% 48% 12% 1% -
26 FIELDS Matthew S. 100% 100% 98% 88% 57% 20% 3%
27 LUTHRA Arjun 100% 100% 98% 88% 60% 25% 4%
28 ZHANG Jeffrey 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 59% 15%
29 CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. 100% 100% 99% 94% 71% 31% 5%
30 ZHU Shao 100% 91% 58% 21% 4% - -
31 SHTEYN Mark 100% 100% 95% 72% 34% 8% 1%
32 ALKEMPER Tristan H. 100% 99% 93% 71% 34% 7%
33 KIM Matthew 100% 100% 99% 94% 70% 29% 4%
34 NOURELDIN Gabriel 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 56% 15%
35 HU Andrew 100% 100% 100% 97% 79% 36%
36 WOLF Gabriel M. 100% 68% 25% 5% - -
37 BABAYEV Gabriel A. 100% 86% 49% 16% 3% -
38 ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. 100% 100% 99% 94% 74% 36% 6%
39 LEE Justin 100% 100% 99% 94% 74% 39% 9%
40 DENG Andrew 100% 100% 98% 83% 47% 14% 1%
41 MORALES Jonathan 100% 100% 97% 79% 43% 12% 1%
42 LIU Mingyang Ryan 100% 93% 66% 27% 6% 1% -
43 KILGALLEN William 100% 99% 92% 66% 30% 6% -
44 BREKHMAN Eric 100% 80% 35% 7% 1% - -
45 ZHENG Edward L. 100% 100% 95% 69% 28% 4%
46 PANDEY Neil 100% 77% 37% 10% 1% -
47 SANDHU Arjan 100% 78% 27% 4% - -
48 CLYMER Lucas Y. 100% 100% 95% 74% 37% 8%
49 ZHUANG Rayken 100% 95% 64% 23% 3% -
49 YOU Jaden 100% 77% 37% 10% 1% -
51 BRIDGES Benjamin 100% 99% 92% 64% 26% 4%
52 LEONARD Charles 100% 100% 96% 79% 42% 10% 1%
53 DOLAN Charles R. 100% 99% 87% 54% 17% 2% -
53 OVERDECK Andrew 100% 90% 55% 18% 3% - -
55 SKABICH Nicholas 100% 95% 71% 32% 7% 1% -
56 TONG Luke 100% 69% 28% 6% 1% - -
57 MARGULIES William 100% 97% 82% 47% 13% 1%
58 WONG Ryan 100% 98% 84% 51% 17% 2%
59 PENG Bryan 100% 99% 92% 68% 34% 9% 1%
60 OH Triton 100% 96% 77% 42% 13% 2% -
61 KOVACH Jonah F. 100% 100% 96% 78% 43% 13% 2%
62 KASPER Aaron 100% 55% 14% 2% - - -
63 CASTELBLANCO Henry 100% 79% 27% 4% - - -
64 GEORGE Daniel 100% 94% 68% 27% 4% -
66 ZHENG Joshua 100% 88% 53% 18% 3% - -
67 ALTIRS Giorgio 100% 98% 82% 47% 14% 2% -
68 HONG Justin 100% 96% 73% 34% 8% 1% -
69 SHOMAN Noah 100% 100% 99% 88% 56% 19% 2%
70 GOLDMAN Noah R. 100% 95% 74% 38% 11% 2% -
71 HYMES Matthew 100% 94% 66% 28% 5% - -
72 LEUNG Andrew K. 100% 76% 34% 7% 1% - -
73 PERRON Robert 100% 78% 33% 6% - - -
74 HUANG Maxwell H. 100% 92% 62% 26% 6% 1%
75 CHENG Hong 100% 47% 7% - - -
76 LEMPERT Adam 100% 84% 47% 15% 2% - -
78 SHI Erick 100% 63% 19% 3% - - -
79 PARKER Benjamin D. 100% 85% 46% 14% 2% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.