Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JOO Natalie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% |
| 2 | MCSHERRY Ava | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 74% |
| 3 | YU Jane | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 33% |
| 3 | WANG Amabel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% |
| 5 | FENG Audrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 52% |
| 6 | LI Katerina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% | 38% | 5% |
| 7 | KIM Claire | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 14% |
| 8 | MCSHERRY Kayla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 10% |
| 9 | SHMAY Anastasia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 29% |
| 10 | SHIM Grace J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 60% |
| 11 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% | 14% |
| 12 | LIU Yinuo | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 13 | ORBE-AUSTIN Nia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 18% | 2% |
| 14 | ZELDIN Nadia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 42% | 6% |
| 15 | PEVZNER Nicole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 27% |
| 16 | HAO Danica | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% |
| 17 | KRAHE Annika | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 18 | CHEN Sophie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 13% | 1% |
| 19 | JOO Sara | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 28% | 3% |
| 20 | DE CASTRO Kai | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 47% | 11% | 1% |
| 21 | SHIN Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 14% | 1% |
| 22 | COLE Sofia | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 23 | BERGEL Daphne | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 7% |
| 24 | HUANG Sophie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 13% | 1% |
| 25 | JIANG Chloe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% | 5% |
| 26 | BASILE Gianna | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
| 27 | SHERLOCK Gabriella | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 8% | - |
| 28 | CHUNG Stella | 100% | 99% | 81% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 29 | ORBÉ-AUSTIN Maya | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 2% |
| 30 | BADLANI Diya | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 31 | MA Emily(Yiming) | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 32 | BERG Samara | 100% | 92% | 41% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 33 | HUSSIAN Annabelle | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
| 34 | BAULIN Zoya | 100% | 98% | 79% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 35 | LAZAR Carolina | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 36 | LI savannah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 8% |
| 37 | PELLE Lia | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 38 | PEVZNER Sophia | 100% | 90% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 39 | PUOPOLO Mia | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 40 | ZHU Ella | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 24% | 3% | - |
| 41 | SUN Erin | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 42 | JANSSEN Juliane | 100% | 95% | 68% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
| 43 | ZINITI-LAU Elena | 100% | 97% | 74% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 44 | WU Maggie Lei | 100% | 98% | 80% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 45 | REZA Fukaina | 100% | 98% | 78% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 46 | STEWART Isla | 100% | 94% | 45% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | CHOE Alice | 100% | 85% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | BEKIYANTS Elizabeth | 100% | 87% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | DEEKEN Anna | 100% | 97% | 67% | 15% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | ALBRECHT-SMITH Anne | 100% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 51 | CLARK Lillian | 100% | 53% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 52 | GOMEZ Sofia | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 53 | JIANG Doris | 100% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 54 | LENZ Phoebe | 100% | 42% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | GUSTAFSSON Anna | 100% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 56 | OTTERMAN Jenna | 100% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.