Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | MIKA Veronica | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 35% |
| 2 | WANG Jianning | 2% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 3 | ALCEBAR Kayla | - | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 47% |
| 3 | OBRADOVIC Ana | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% |
| 5 | PRIEUR Lauren | - | 1% | 12% | 36% | 39% | 12% |
| 6 | MANSPERGER Leena | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% |
| 7 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
| 8 | XIKES Katherine E. | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 7% |
| 9 | VADASZ Ibla P. | - | - | 2% | 19% | 52% | 27% |
| 10 | HILD Nisha | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 43% | 17% |
| 11 | SOURIMTO Valeria | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% |
| 12 | CHIANG Emily | - | 5% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 6% |
| 13 | LEE Sophia | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
| 14 | SHIH Christina | - | 2% | 14% | 39% | 38% | 7% |
| 15 | LU Elaine | - | 2% | 17% | 41% | 32% | 8% |
| 16 | BILILIES Sophia | 4% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 17 | SINHA Anika | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 27% |
| 18 | RIZKALA Joanna | - | - | 1% | 10% | 43% | 46% |
| 19 | YUN Emma | 1% | 10% | 32% | 39% | 16% | 1% |
| 20 | JENKINS Scotland | 3% | 21% | 43% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 21 | GRINBERG Aliya | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% |
| 22 | KIM Marley I. | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 43% | 14% |
| 23 | LEE Hannah | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 12% |
| 24 | WHALEN Paige C. | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 25 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | - | 12% | 40% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
| 26 | DAVIS Jordan | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% |
| 27 | NAYAK Indra | 1% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 16% | 2% |
| 27 | HE Xi | 8% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 29 | YAN Ava | 32% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 30 | ILYIN Anna | 26% | 47% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 31 | SHEN Jamie | 18% | 42% | 31% | 8% | - | - |
| 32 | YI Felicia | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 33 | UCLES Giovanna | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 34 | REN Xinling | 1% | 10% | 35% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
| 35 | CHIANG Sydney | 37% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 36 | LITVAK-HINENZON Michaela | 71% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 37 | MCKEE Ainsley | 10% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 38 | YEN Natalie | 27% | 46% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 39 | OGANEZOVA Valerie | 1% | 16% | 39% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
| 40 | NGUYEN Ella | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 41 | CRUZ Sonia | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 42 | WANG Audrey | 21% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 43 | GOMERMAN Sophia | 6% | 50% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 44 | MONTORIO Lily M. | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 45 | NAYAK Esha | 15% | 42% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 46 | NAYAK Anika | 2% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 46 | FLATT Sophia | 12% | 50% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 48 | SODANO Kylie | 84% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.