Prime Fencing Academy - Dublin, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | AGARWAL Savya | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 44% |
| 2 | CHEN Owen | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 39% |
| 3 | MA Isabelle | 1% | 8% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 3% |
| 3 | GANAPATHI Eshan | - | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 55% |
| 5 | DOUGLASS Liam | - | - | 1% | 12% | 88% | |
| 6 | AHN Theodore | - | 2% | 17% | 44% | 32% | 6% |
| 7 | BURLINGAME Owen | - | 1% | 12% | 38% | 39% | 10% |
| 8 | CHEN Jinyu | 3% | 25% | 45% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 9 | GARCIA Carter | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
| 10 | MATTUPALLI Ashwika | - | 1% | 19% | 76% | 3% | |
| 11 | FERREYRA Emilio | 9% | 45% | 37% | 9% | - | - |
| 12 | NGUYEN VAN Constantin | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 13 | GAMBARIN Matthew | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% |
| 14 | CHETWANI naman | 1% | 16% | 45% | 30% | 7% | - |
| 15 | HOQUE Raiden | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% |
| 16 | RENGANATHAN Krithiga | 2% | 25% | 63% | 9% | - | |
| 17 | ASSAO Neil | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 18 | HUANG Barron | 7% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 19 | WILLIAMS Matthew | 1% | 13% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 1% |
| 20 | CHENG Maxwell | 37% | 49% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 21 | MAQSOOD Minnah | 39% | 49% | 12% | - | - | |
| 22 | HONG Richard | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 6% |
| 23 | GUPTA Pearl | 22% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 24 | BLACK Nicole | 4% | 26% | 42% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 25 | RASTOGI Saiansh | 29% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 26 | LI Albert | 63% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 27 | BOSCHEN SHIH Aedan | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 28 | LEE Heejin | 1% | 18% | 41% | 31% | 8% | - |
| 28 | KIM Isabella | 13% | 45% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.