Cobra Challenge SYC/RCC

Cadet Women's Foil

Friday, November 28, 2025 at 1:00 PM

Meadowlands Expo Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 TSIMIKLIS Aphrodite - - - 1% 13% 41% 44%
2 ZHAO Olivia - - 1% 11% 40% 40% 8%
3 KIM Claire - - - 3% 17% 44% 36%
3 LIU Qianchen E. - - 1% 9% 30% 42% 18%
5 DUAN Sophie - - - 4% 29% 67%
6 MCSHERRY Ava - - - - 2% 24% 73%
7 WANG Carol - - - 1% 7% 33% 60%
8 HU Sophie - - 3% 18% 40% 32% 7%
9 JOO Natalie - - - - 5% 32% 63%
10 HARRIS Julia - - - 2% 15% 41% 41%
11 MCFARLANE Asha - - - 1% 11% 40% 48%
12 YIN Chloe - - 5% 23% 42% 25% 5%
13 ORRINGER Lottie - - 2% 18% 45% 30% 4%
14 WANG Dina C. - 1% 9% 30% 38% 18% 3%
15 SUN Nicole 2% 12% 30% 34% 18% 4% -
16 CHANG Lydia - 3% 17% 41% 34% 5%
17 CAO Amelie - - 2% 13% 33% 38% 14%
18 MUMMANENI Samyuta - - - 2% 15% 41% 42%
19 HOROWITZ Shuli - - 1% 9% 32% 44% 14%
20 CHEN Sophie - - 1% 14% 51% 30% 3%
21 ZAMLYNNY Maya - - 3% 15% 34% 35% 13%
22 MCSHERRY Kayla - - - 2% 13% 41% 44%
23 ZELDIN Nadia - - - 5% 35% 51% 8%
24 KRAHE Annika - - 1% 9% 31% 43% 16%
25 REZA Fukaina 1% 7% 22% 35% 26% 8% 1%
26 WANG Amabel - - - 4% 21% 44% 31%
27 CHOI Jion - - 3% 13% 34% 39% 12%
28 DE CASTRO Kai - 1% 6% 23% 38% 26% 6%
29 LI Joy - - 1% 8% 27% 42% 22%
30 LI Christina - 1% 14% 35% 34% 14% 2%
31 XU-FERGUSON Victoria 6% 23% 36% 25% 9% 1% -
32 HUANG Sophie - - 6% 25% 39% 24% 5%
33 JOO Sara - - 2% 12% 31% 38% 17%
34 ZHU Ella - 1% 13% 36% 35% 13% 1%
35 KOU Elisha 1% 6% 26% 42% 23% 2%
36 SFINTESCU Emma - 2% 12% 33% 37% 14% 2%
37 ZHU Alivia - 8% 34% 38% 17% 3% -
38 SHIN Elizabeth - 1% 7% 24% 38% 26% 4%
39 COLE Sofia - 3% 16% 33% 31% 14% 2%
40 LI Savannah - - 3% 16% 39% 35% 8%
41 MA Emily(Yiming) - 7% 30% 40% 19% 4% -
42 ORBÉ-AUSTIN Maya - - 6% 24% 39% 25% 5%
42 BO Iris - 2% 15% 37% 33% 11% 1%
42 KUTATELADZE Anna 1% 9% 29% 39% 19% 4% -
45 YAO Abby - - 1% 11% 34% 41% 13%
46 XING Melly - 2% 14% 34% 34% 13% 2%
47 HAFEZ Tahiyah - - - 2% 14% 41% 42%
48 IWERSEN Marte 1% 11% 31% 35% 18% 4% -
49 LIU Caydence - 4% 24% 45% 23% 4% -
50 LIN Katherine 1% 6% 22% 35% 27% 8% 1%
51 LEO Jenna - 8% 35% 38% 16% 2% -
52 PEVZNER Sophia 7% 27% 36% 22% 7% 1% -
53 MALIK Manha - 10% 34% 37% 16% 3% -
54 MURPHY Genevieve - 4% 20% 38% 29% 9% 1%
55 BAULIN Zoya 1% 34% 42% 19% 3% - -
56 EYER Brooke - - 3% 15% 36% 36% 10%
57 ZHENG Annalyn 1% 9% 25% 35% 23% 6% 1%
58 CHO Olivia - 5% 20% 35% 28% 11% 1%
59 WU Charlotte 16% 36% 31% 13% 3% - -
60 CHAN Jolene - 6% 26% 39% 23% 5% -
61 WAN Celine 6% 29% 38% 21% 5% 1% -
62 HOLLIS Priscillia 3% 21% 43% 29% 5% - -
63 PHAN Logan 4% 20% 35% 29% 11% 2% -
64 SUN Erin 8% 33% 36% 17% 4% - -
65 LUO Lucy - 9% 32% 37% 18% 3% -
66 GENG Emma 2% 19% 42% 31% 5% - -
67 HONG Mabel 17% 41% 32% 9% 1% -
68 COUAILLIER Lou 2% 27% 43% 23% 5% - -
69 FAN Melody 18% 41% 30% 9% 1% - -
70 MAIA ZUCKERMAN Julia 4% 37% 39% 16% 3% - -
71 FEDER Acadia 1% 11% 31% 36% 17% 3% -
72 DONG Katelyn 5% 42% 40% 11% 1% - -
73 PAEK Mila 45% 40% 13% 2% - - -
74 LIU Bella 7% 52% 33% 8% 1% - -
75 SONG Sarah 50% 38% 10% 1% - - -
76 CAVANAGH Emma 6% 27% 41% 22% 4% -
77 PAN Yiran 1% 8% 26% 35% 22% 7% 1%
78 CHOI Cara 3% 17% 36% 31% 11% 1% -
79 MACKINTOSH Quinn 14% 35% 33% 15% 3% - -
79 YOUM Amelia 7% 33% 40% 17% 3% - -
81 KIM Claire 2% 25% 47% 23% 3% - -
82 JOHNSON Elizabeth 79% 19% 1% - - - -
83 JIANG Doris 48% 39% 12% 2% - - -
84 SHUTZER Lily 1% 21% 43% 28% 7% 1% -
85 KUI Ava 86% 14% 1% - - - -
86 JAIN Dia 24% 42% 26% 7% 1% - -
87 GUSTAFSSON Anna 83% 16% 1% - - - -
88 LENZ Phoebe 46% 40% 12% 1% - - -
89 HOU Xu 29% 44% 22% 4% - -
90 DUNCAN Kate 79% 20% 2% - - - -
91 PELLE Lia 12% 33% 34% 17% 4% - -
91 KASHUBA Mila 4% 25% 41% 24% 6% 1% -
91 TREMBLAY Ariane 11% 41% 37% 11% 1% - -
94 SINGH Evangelina 2% 16% 36% 32% 12% 2% -
95 ALBRECHT-SMITH Anne 8% 52% 32% 7% 1% - -
95 CHESK Kamila 95% 5% - - - - -
97 LOBO Sophie 78% 20% 1% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.