Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | JANG Kimberley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 30% | |
2 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% |
3 | TALAVERA Daena | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% |
3 | CHEN Allison V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 33% | |
5 | SHEN Lydia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 57% | 15% | |
6 | SHAW Kayla M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 16% |
7 | SHEN Sophia | 100% | 100% | 95% | 60% | 18% | 2% | |
8 | LI Meilin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 88% | 50% | 11% | |
9 | WU Irene M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 19% | |
9 | MCGILLION-MOORE Katie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | |
9 | ZHANG Alina C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 44% | |
12 | LEE Bethany W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 28% | 6% |
13 | HUANG Natalie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% | 2% |
14 | CHUSID Mikayla | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 18% | |
15 | SHEN Annabel | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 1% | |
16 | WU Julianna Y. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - | |
17 | SADAN Jordan E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 35% |
18 | XU Madison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% | 10% |
19 | YU Jaime L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 63% | 22% | 3% |
20 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 33% | |
21 | EYER Hailey M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 33% | 6% | |
22 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
23 | DU Hannah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 9% |
24 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 20% | |
25 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 11% | |
26 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | 100% | 96% | 68% | 27% | 5% | - | |
27 | XIE zoey | 100% | 98% | 83% | 53% | 21% | 5% | - |
28 | LIN Victoria T. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 8% | - |
29 | HOU Wendong | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 25% | 4% | - |
30 | YU Nicole J. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
31 | BHAN Zala | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
32 | CHO Rebecca H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
33 | LIU Sophia | 100% | 99% | 80% | 37% | 7% | - | |
34 | SU Michelle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 14% |
35 | ORVANANOS Anice | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
36 | FELLUS Talia E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 10% | - |
37 | TOBIN Brean | 100% | 93% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
38 | WANG Chloe | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 34% | 6% | |
39 | GU EMILY | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 4% | |
40 | ROY Layla | 100% | 100% | 93% | 48% | 11% | 1% | |
41 | ZHANG Rongrui | 100% | 99% | 83% | 43% | 10% | 1% | |
42 | KOKES Gwendolen | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
43 | LEE Lavender | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 28% | 3% | |
44 | KULKARNI Sohah A. | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 3% | - | |
45 | PAVE Claire | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | |
46 | YU Lauren C. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - |
47 | SOLDATOVA Maria | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | 16% | 1% |
48 | PARK Caitlyn | 100% | 87% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
49 | CHEN Jasmine | 100% | 87% | 48% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
50 | LI Rachel Y. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% | |
51 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 100% | 97% | 74% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
52 | LENZ Zoe N. | 100% | 98% | 74% | 31% | 6% | - | |
53 | PARK Jacqueline | 100% | 76% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
54 | STAIKOS Eleni | 100% | 57% | 8% | - | - | - | |
55 | YU Esther J. | 100% | 67% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
56 | KOGAN Stella | 100% | 86% | 47% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
58 | ZHU Elise | 100% | 73% | 30% | 6% | - | - | - |
59 | WILTSE Kaiya M. | 100% | 56% | 5% | - | - | - | |
60 | KOGAN Alexis | 100% | 39% | 7% | - | - | - | |
60 | LEE Kaitlyn | 100% | 34% | 2% | - | - | - | |
62 | JONES Jenna | 100% | 77% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
63 | LAPPER Whitney P. | 100% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | |
64 | ENG Alexy P. | 100% | 62% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.