Cobra Challenge SYC/RCC

Cadet Men's Foil

Sunday, November 30, 2025 at 1:00 PM

Meadowlands Expo Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 DOELL Ethan - - - - 3% 24% 73%
2 GULCHIN Mark (Yerma) - - - - 2% 18% 81%
3 PLUMMER Waylon - 1% 9% 29% 40% 21%
3 CHA James - - - 1% 7% 34% 59%
5 GRIFFITH MCALLISTER thomas - - - 1% 10% 39% 50%
6 KIM Daniel - 4% 16% 32% 31% 15% 2%
7 WANG Mendy - 1% 8% 27% 42% 21%
8 JIN Andy - 2% 11% 27% 35% 21% 5%
9 CHO Jadon Yushin - - - - 1% 16% 83%
10 HOU Gaven - - 1% 10% 30% 40% 19%
11 CHEN Ethan - - - 1% 10% 38% 51%
12 HUA Aaron - - 2% 13% 41% 44%
13 JIMENEZ Naveen - - - 1% 10% 38% 51%
14 CHEN Hanson - - - - 3% 26% 71%
15 PAN Ethan - - 1% 11% 32% 39% 16%
16 KUPERBERG Thomas 5% 25% 39% 24% 7% 1% -
17 ZHAI Derrick - - 2% 11% 33% 42% 13%
18 ZHUANG Disheng (Eddie) - 6% 23% 38% 26% 6% -
19 SONG HAN GYEOL - 4% 18% 36% 31% 10% -
20 CHANG Parker - - 3% 15% 36% 36% 9%
21 LIN Jun Hui - 7% 36% 38% 16% 3% -
22 XIE Jicheng - - 2% 10% 28% 39% 22%
23 XU Nathan - 1% 6% 24% 40% 26% 3%
24 BEYDOUN Sam - 2% 14% 37% 34% 11% 1%
25 ZHANG Hanru - 1% 9% 28% 40% 20% 2%
26 ZHANG GAVIN J - 1% 8% 27% 42% 22%
27 HOLMES Alexiy - 4% 18% 36% 32% 10%
28 HUYNH Matthew - 1% 5% 22% 39% 28% 6%
29 ZHAO Ryan - 1% 9% 31% 38% 19% 3%
29 JAZWINSKI Ryan - 1% 8% 26% 39% 24% 2%
31 DI TELLA Ulises 1% 10% 29% 37% 19% 4% -
32 WANG Luke 2% 19% 40% 30% 8% 1%
33 BAKSHI Aman - - 4% 18% 39% 34% 5%
34 BAS Jonathan 3% 20% 38% 28% 9% 1% -
35 SHAW Spencer - - 3% 20% 41% 30% 5%
36 BAI Austin - - 2% 13% 44% 41%
37 AYYAGARI Abhiram 3% 22% 41% 28% 6% -
38 ZHAI Alex 1% 9% 28% 37% 21% 4%
39 MARTIRE Luca - 2% 12% 35% 40% 12%
40 LIU Alex - - 5% 25% 47% 23%
41 CHOU-ESTEBAN Pau - 5% 20% 36% 30% 9% -
42 LI Jayden 1% 7% 24% 36% 25% 7% -
43 FAN Ze Lin - 2% 11% 31% 37% 17% 2%
44 PAN Howard Haoran 2% 11% 28% 35% 20% 4% -
45 JIN George 2% 17% 38% 32% 10% 1%
46 POLEBOYINA Amrit 3% 17% 35% 32% 12% 2%
47 JIN Daniel - 3% 16% 34% 33% 12% 1%
48 WANG Freyr 4% 25% 39% 25% 7% 1% -
49 GRUNENWALD Henri - - 7% 28% 38% 22% 4%
50 KEEGAN Cole 6% 25% 37% 24% 7% 1% -
51 QU Richard - 4% 15% 31% 32% 15% 3%
52 YANG CHENLE 10% 30% 35% 19% 5% 1% -
53 NOVIKOV Yann 4% 18% 33% 29% 13% 3% -
54 KAYE Ben 5% 24% 38% 25% 7% 1%
55 HUANG Jinyao 3% 25% 42% 25% 5% -
56 QIAN Zekai - 6% 23% 37% 26% 7% -
57 HU Weijie 10% 31% 36% 18% 4% - -
58 ARORA Maximilian Andras A. 8% 27% 36% 22% 7% 1% -
58 CHOI Hunter 2% 11% 28% 35% 20% 5% -
60 SUN Nathan 4% 19% 34% 29% 12% 2% -
61 ZHANG Ethan 18% 37% 30% 12% 2% - -
62 LEE Kyle 15% 37% 32% 13% 2% - -
63 TOOMRE Kai 1% 10% 30% 36% 19% 3%
64 EZEKIEL Nathan 6% 26% 38% 24% 6% 1%
65 ZHENG Austin - 3% 16% 34% 33% 12% 1%
66 DIAZ Gabriel 2% 14% 32% 34% 16% 3% -
67 CHEN Kevin 11% 37% 37% 12% 2% - -
68 FALCONE Jack 1% 14% 36% 35% 13% 1%
69 TIAN Dylan 30% 42% 22% 5% 1% -
70 SONG Enoch - 1% 6% 26% 41% 24% 3%
71 LEONG Samuel 1% 10% 28% 36% 20% 4% -
72 SAMUEL Lucas - 5% 22% 38% 27% 7% 1%
73 LINDEMANN Conrad 14% 35% 33% 15% 3% - -
74 CHENG Andrew 44% 40% 13% 2% - - -
75 BRADFORD-WATT Ezra 44% 41% 13% 2% - - -
76 KUBBA Krish 4% 27% 41% 23% 5% -
77 LIANG Haojia 30% 43% 22% 5% 1% -
78 REN Ryan 15% 38% 33% 12% 2% -
79 BHATT Jayan 8% 33% 38% 18% 4% - -
80 ZHANG Julian 2% 11% 30% 35% 18% 4% -
81 RAJAT Rivaan 30% 54% 15% 1% - - -
82 SUN Andrew 30% 45% 22% 4% - - -
83 LIN Evan 13% 39% 35% 11% 1% - -
84 XU Ryan 5% 26% 38% 23% 6% 1% -
85 TSIMBERG Jadon 40% 42% 16% 3% - - -
86 LU Hansen 2% 18% 37% 31% 11% 2% -
87 FRIEDMAN Marcus 50% 43% 7% - - - -
88 CHENG Karter 19% 39% 30% 11% 2% - -
89 CHAE Thomas Woojin 65% 30% 5% - - -
90 LIN Oliver 62% 32% 6% - - -
91 LIU jeremy 20% 40% 29% 10% 1% - -
92 SUSANTO William < 1% 4% 20% 37% 29% 9% 1%
93 CASH Zachary 57% 34% 8% 1% - - -
94 XU Lucas 10% 39% 35% 13% 2% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.