Event Results
Go Mean Green TournamentDifficulty Map
Each box shows how difficult an opponent was from the fencer's point of view.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | MAKINO Saiki | V V V V | V V V | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 2 | ORDUNO Edgar | D V V V | V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 3 | SENISCH Isaac | V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 3 | MCCOURRY Evellyn | D V V V V | V D | 1.1 | 4 | +2.9 |
| 5 | GREENAWAY Stuart | V D D V V | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 6 | QURESHI Shaheer | V V D D D | D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 7 | HAUGHT Megan | D V V D | V D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 8 | VASHISHTH Adi | D V D D D | V D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 9 | LI Kate | V D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 10 | GARCIA Samantha | D D D D | D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 |
| 11 | NGUYEN Bao Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 12 | TRAN Catherine | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 13 | MIKAL Amora's Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| Color | Difficulty | Win Probability |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |