Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHEN Kyle P. | - | - | 5% | 25% | 46% | 24% | |
2 | MARX Jackson L. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 74% |
3 | CHA James | - | - | 1% | 6% | 31% | 62% | |
3 | JURMAN Therin | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
5 | LEE Jonah | - | - | 5% | 26% | 50% | 18% | |
6 | WONG Jacob W. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
7 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 21% | |
8 | GULCHIN Mark | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 43% | 27% | |
9 | LIN James G. | - | - | 2% | 18% | 49% | 30% | |
10 | HAN Jinu | 4% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 6% | - | |
10 | WONG Jackson | 1% | 10% | 34% | 39% | 14% | 2% | |
12 | LEE Brendan | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 1% |
13 | ZHU Brandan | 35% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
14 | GOFMAN Robert | 9% | 35% | 40% | 15% | 2% | - | |
15 | SHIM Peter S. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 2% |
16 | ONIK Ari N. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% | |
17 | HONG Logan | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 21% | 4% | - |
18 | BOBROW Silas | 6% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | |
19 | UNGERER Roger M. | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
20 | SIMON Luke | 15% | 43% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | |
21 | MALHAM Andrew | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
22 | CROWE Adam D. | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 32% | 7% | |
23 | MCGILLION-MOORE Charles | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
24 | FOGELSON Hugh | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 36% | 6% | |
25 | TAN Aidan | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
26 | CAO Ray | 6% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
27 | CHO Xzander | 28% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
28 | GERRISH William | 1% | 13% | 39% | 35% | 11% | 1% | |
29 | AKYAMAC Bora | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
30 | LI Allen | 3% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
30 | LEE Eugene | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | |
32 | CHUNG Ian | 43% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
33 | TAI Ethan | 2% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
34 | TAI Justin | - | 5% | 25% | 42% | 25% | 3% | |
35 | TONG Ian | 25% | 47% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
37 | ZENG Rick | 32% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.