Palm Springs Convention Center - Palm Springs, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LIU Ariana | V V V D V V | V V V V V V | 5.6 | 5 | -0.6 |
| 2 | LIU Ashley | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 3 | PARK Lauren | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 3 | ZHANG Lian | D V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.7 | 5 | -0.7 |
| 5 | GONG Hai | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 6 | YAO Abby | V V V D V V | V V V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 7 | ZHOU Joi | D V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 8 | LEE Zoe E. | D V V D D | V V V V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 9 | KENSICKI Phoebe | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 10 | FANG Kelervia | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 11 | YANG Hanli | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 12 | CHEN Summer | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
| 13 | CHUNG Katie | V V V V | V V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 14 | WU Gloria | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 15 | ZHANG Viviana | V V D V V D | V V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 16 | LU Keeva | D D D V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 17 | HOM Emma | V V V V V | V D | 2.3 | 5 | +2.7 |
| 18 | RUI Jessie | V V V D V V | V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 19 | WEN Cynthia | V V D V V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 19 | DAI Iris Yuyang | D V V V V V | V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 21 | MIYOSHI Kylie | V V D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 22 | ZEE Savannah | V V V D V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 22 | YU Sophie | V D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 24 | GOWDA Siyona | V V V V D | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 25 | THOTA Akira | V V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 26 | CHENG Audrey | V V D D V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 27 | FRASER Morgan | D V V D V V | V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
| 28 | LIN Avery | V V D V D V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 29 | LI Annabelle | D V V V D V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 30 | HOM Avery | D D V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 31 | CHOI Jian | V D D D V V | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 32 | LAM Dorris Yandor | V V D V D D | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 33 | KIM Natalie | V V V V V V | D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
| 34 | ZHANG Katie Q. | D V V V V V | D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
| 35 | WANG Doreen | V V D V V | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 36 | KHETPAL Aalia | V D V V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 37 | KIM Ines | V V V D D V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 38 | HUANG Emma | D V V V D V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 39 | BANDZELADZE Emma | V V V D D V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 40 | DESAI Zoya | D V V D V | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 41 | KO Adeline | D V D V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 42 | BHANGOO Paloma | V V D V D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 43 | DEJOY Leilah | V V V D D | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 44 | KIM Audrey | D V V D D V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 45 | CHEN bridgette | V D V D D V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 46 | ZHANG Hannah | V D D V V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 47 | ARUNKISHORE Dakshina | V D V D D V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 48 | KIM Rylie | D V V D V D | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 49 | GUO Jianing | V D D V V D | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 50 | PAN Samantha | V D D V D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 51 | CHEN Madeleine | V V D D D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 52 | KIM Lauren | V D D V D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 53 | SAIFEE Sakina | D D V D | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 54 | FAN Lauren | D D V V D | V D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 55 | LIU Anya | D V V D D D | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 56 | HONG ELSIE | D D V D V D | D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 57 | PAWAR Sanvi | D V D D D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 58 | ZHU Claire | V D D V D D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 59 | TAI Taphanie | D D V D V D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 60 | CHEN Aimee | D D V D V D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 61 | NICOLETTI Thea | D D D D V | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 62 | DONG Nancy | D D D V D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 63 | YANG Byanca | D D D D D V | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 64 | TIAN Claire | V D D D D D | V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 65 | LIU Doris-Zihan Zhou | V D D V D V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 66 | RENGANATHAN Krithiga | D D V V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 67 | SAIFEE Zahra | D V D D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 68 | KHANAL Sarah | V D D V D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 69 | ZHANG Annabelle | D D V V D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 70 | YUNG Zoe | V D D D V D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 71 | LIU Madeleine | V D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 72 | VALOUEVA Katerina | D V D V D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 74 | YANG Claire | D D D D V | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 75 | GROSSMAN Elizabeth | D D D D V | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 76 | ARCE BASURCO Juliana | D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 77 | LAVERY Lucy | D D D V D D | D | 3.6 | 1 | -2.6 |
| 78 | TATINENI Charvi | D D D D D V | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 78 | FU Joy | D V D D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 80 | STOCK Nina | D D D V D D | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
| 81 | YOU Mina | D D D D V D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 82 | LUO Olivia | D D V D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 83 | CHOI Mackenzie | D D D V D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 84 | PARK Aileen | D V D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 85 | DOMANTAY Sophia | D D D V D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 86 | OH Amber | D D D V D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 87 | ALEKSANDROVA Mira | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 88 | SANTIAGO Rania | D D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
| 89 | LAI Olivia | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 90 | CHO Rylee | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 91 | SOUSA Lauren | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 91 | HUANG Veronica | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 93 | BAKIR Dina | D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.