Thousand Oaks, CA - Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CALLAHAN Jaden P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 27% |
| 2 | KIM Noah L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% |
| 3 | WANG Eric Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% | |
| 3 | RAJA Arnav | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 39% |
| 5 | DHINGRA Gian K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 21% |
| 6 | TANN Justin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 16% | |
| 7 | YUN Jaesun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 30% | |
| 8 | QIU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 52% | 12% | |
| 9 | CHEN Lucas B. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 24% | 3% | |
| 10 | ALKIN Isaac | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 11 | GAO Ethan | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 12 | LICHT Aaron H. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
| 13 | GIANETTO Ethan K. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% | |
| 14 | LEUNG Nathan | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 15 | VO Minh Q. | 100% | 78% | 30% | 6% | - | - | |
| 16 | CHAN Aidan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 17 | LIRA Daine C. | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 18 | LO Konnor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 29% | |
| 19 | AVAKIAN Alec | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 2% | |
| 20 | REED Samuel J. | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 21 | ZUBATIY Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 7% |
| 22 | HO Aiden | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 23 | WANG YiLe(Justin) | 100% | 92% | 61% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 24 | DAVIS Oliver | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 10% | 1% | |
| 25 | SHI Kyle | 100% | 70% | 24% | 3% | - | - | |
| 26 | PATIL Aaryan A. | 100% | 94% | 67% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 27 | CENTENO Zachary | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 28 | LIKER Maxim J. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 18% | 1% | - |
| 29 | LEE Conner M. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 7% | - | |
| 30 | ZHANG Lingyong | 100% | 69% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 31 | LO Andrew T. | 100% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 31 | GUO Ethan | 100% | 78% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.