Manhattan Fencing of Englewood - Englewood, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HU Simon | - | - | - | 4% | 26% | 70% | |
| 2 | ADOLPHUS March | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% |
| 3 | VINCENT Yian | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 9% | ||
| 5 | GUO Zi-Yang | 1% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
| 6 | BORROK Andrew | 2% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 7 | WONG Jacob | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 21% | ||
| 8 | JIANG Elvin | 14% | 40% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 9 | JOHN Christian | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% | ||
| 10 | BELTRAN-PRATS Enzo | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
| 11 | SHI Henry | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 12 | PASQUALE Roman | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 25% | 10% | 1% |
| 13 | LERMAN Elan | 7% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 14 | HUI Nicholas | 43% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 15 | PARHI Kairav | - | 1% | 16% | 49% | 31% | 3% | |
| 16 | CHANTENGCO John Stephen | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
| 17 | ANHAVA Cato | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% | |
| 18 | BELLOWS Blake | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 19 | LAM Cooper | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 20 | MALM Gabriel | 16% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% | ||
| 20 | LIU Victor | 28% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | ||
| 22 | CHOI Hudson | 7% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 2% | - | |
| 23 | MCCAFFREY Balthazar | 9% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 24 | SOHN William | < 1% | 1% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 14% | |
| 25 | FAOZAN Jakarta | < 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.