Thousand Oaks, CA - Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 45% | 38% |
2 | PENG Amber L. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 44% | 22% |
3 | KOSLOW Amicie | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 4% | < 1% |
3 | CHANG Elizabeth | - | - | - | 3% | 14% | 39% | 45% |
5 | DANG Elizabeth H. | 1% | 13% | 39% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - |
6 | LAI Evelyn | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
7 | SWEENEY Helena | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% |
8 | RAO Sonia D. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 17% |
9 | HU Kate | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 10% |
10 | OTEYZA Camille | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
12 | HOBSON Ava | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
13 | CHEW Alexis T. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
14 | UMAP Arna | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
15 | SUN Emily | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
16 | GUPTA Dea | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
17 | TSANG Catherine | 11% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
18 | SHUM Maya | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 2% |
19 | VO Bao-Vy | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | - |
20 | MANIKTALA Prisha | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
21 | LEE Brielle | 1% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
22 | TEPMAN Alexandra D. | 4% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
23 | XU Audrey J. | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
24 | YANG Helen | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
25 | LEE Allison | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
26 | DANIELYANTS Gabriela | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
27 | CHOI Kailyn | 6% | 37% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
28 | HO Kristen | 9% | 40% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.