San Francisco, CA - San Francisco, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | CHUNG Jaein | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% |
| 2 | TOM Caitlyn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 18% |
| 3 | SUN Ruoxi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 43% |
| 3 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 46% |
| 5 | KOSLOW Amicie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
| 6 | SUN Chien-Yu | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
| 7 | LUO Sandra J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% |
| 8 | BHARATHI Maithreyi S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 28% |
| 9 | LEE Bethanie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 43% |
| 10 | MITLOFF Allison | 100% | 99% | 85% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 11 | SU Alena J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
| 12 | HOBSON Ava | 100% | 99% | 80% | 39% | 9% | 1% |
| 13 | FUNG Emma | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 62% | 12% |
| 14 | LEE Samantha X. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 15 | BOLES Amanda X. | 100% | 98% | 79% | 39% | 9% | 1% |
| 16 | GONG Chloe | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 7% | 1% |
| 17 | VO Bao-Vy | 100% | 96% | 75% | 34% | 6% | - |
| 18 | KIM Rachel | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 19 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 6% |
| 20 | NAIR Supriya | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 8% |
| 21 | ZHENG Zoe | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 19% | 2% |
| 22 | DHILLON Amani | 100% | 79% | 33% | 6% | - | - |
| 23 | ZHANG Eunice | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 11% |
| 24 | LUH Mia P. | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 8% | 1% |
| 25 | DUONG Zoey | 100% | 93% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 26 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 27 | DAYAL Saahira | 100% | 99% | 84% | 47% | 13% | 1% |
| 28 | PENG Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% |
| 28 | MANIKTALA Prisha | 100% | 95% | 64% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 30 | NICKOLOV Nora | 100% | 91% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 31 | MANN Sophia J. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 31 | LIN Katherine Y. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 34% | 6% | - |
| 33 | TSANG Catherine | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 35 | HO Kristen | 100% | 69% | 23% | 3% | - | - |
| 36 | CONTOS Athena | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 38 | THOMAS Saejel | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | FUNG Vera | 100% | 63% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | LAU Kailey Z. | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.