Thousand Oaks, CA - Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% |
| 2 | KIM Zoe L. | - | 2% | 19% | 44% | 29% | 5% | |
| 3 | PECK Maia A. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 34% | 8% |
| 3 | KAUSHISH Sara | 8% | 47% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 5 | LABRACHE Ella P. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 54% | |
| 6 | BARNOW Sasha | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 38% | 12% | |
| 7 | LEE Natasha | 2% | 15% | 38% | 34% | 11% | 1% | |
| 8 | GAURIAT Jade S. | - | - | 3% | 20% | 42% | 31% | 4% |
| 9 | YPHANTIDES Anthi | - | 2% | 16% | 54% | 26% | 3% | |
| 10 | QURESHI Nisa | 16% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 11 | NGUYEN Tallulah | 2% | 30% | 45% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 12 | KIM Jayna | 28% | 46% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 13 | BARBARA Camille | 7% | 33% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 14 | NGUYEN Jolie T. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 35% | |
| 15 | WOLTERBEEK Elizabeth | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 16 | BENNETT Vienne | 61% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 17 | KONONENKO Alena | - | 3% | 21% | 43% | 30% | 4% | |
| 18 | VIVERO ASHLYE | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 19 | LEE Olivia | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.