Rain City Fencing Center - Bellevue, WA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | RAUTUREAU Hugo | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 76% |
| 2 | ROZALSKI Eli | - | - | - | 1% | 18% | 80% |
| 3 | LEE Christopher | - | - | - | 7% | 35% | 58% |
| 3 | LIPPMAN Sam | - | - | - | 6% | 42% | 51% |
| 5 | UYPECKCUAT Maximillian Trajan | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 39% | 4% |
| 6 | RAUTUREAU Arthur | - | - | 1% | 16% | 54% | 28% |
| 7 | WONG Wesley | - | - | - | 25% | 75% | |
| 8 | OH Christopher | 1% | 34% | 62% | 3% | - | |
| 9 | BHUPATHIRAJU Arjun | 1% | 15% | 38% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
| 10 | BEDWORTH Alistair | - | 4% | 25% | 52% | 18% | 1% |
| 11 | PHILLIPS Shaw | - | 1% | 32% | 53% | 14% | |
| 12 | SU Desmond | 1% | 14% | 38% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 13 | HARROCH Faustin | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 45% | 6% |
| 14 | HO Christopher | 1% | 15% | 47% | 32% | 5% | - |
| 15 | THOMAS Noah | 3% | 43% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 16 | LEE Jayden | - | 5% | 25% | 43% | 24% | 3% |
| 17 | TROXEL Sylvie A. | - | 4% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 5% |
| 18 | SU Preston | - | 11% | 38% | 38% | 11% | - |
| 20 | ZHENG Jonathan | 13% | 41% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 21 | LU Chang | 7% | 37% | 39% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 22 | SCHULTZ Sumi | 21% | 43% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 23 | BERKE Daniel (Dan) L. | - | 9% | 36% | 41% | 14% | 1% |
| 24 | WU Elynna | 24% | 43% | 26% | 6% | - | - |
| 25 | CHANG Austin | 8% | 61% | 27% | 3% | - | - |
| 26 | BARSOUKOVA Nicole | 51% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 27 | QIU Yiran | 44% | 54% | 3% | - | - | |
| 27 | ISLAM Asif | 15% | 42% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 29 | FRIEDEN Quinn | 66% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 30 | HINKLE Paul | 87% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.