Nittany Valley Sports Centre - State College, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MYAT Chloe | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% | |
| 2 | ZHAO Selena | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% |
| 3 | PALMIERI Giuliana M. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 11% |
| 3 | PARK Gabriella | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 5 | BARNES Sarah | - | - | 4% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
| 6 | YERENKOVA Ameliia | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% | |
| 7 | KIM Audrey | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 42% | 26% |
| 8 | KIM isabel | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
| 9 | HO Sophia | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 9 | CANARAN Daphne M. | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 11 | TASSONE Charlie | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 12 | WONG Charlene | - | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 36% | 18% |
| 13 | YANG Selina | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 14 | CAFAGNA Sofia | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% | |
| 15 | KRANKEL Claire | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 16 | JUNG Elise | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 25% | 10% | 1% |
| 17 | CHAN Isla | 7% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 18 | MAEDING Makayla | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 19 | ZHANG Emily | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 20 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Maia | 5% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
| 20 | VATSA Shradha | 30% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
| 20 | ONO Lisa | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 23 | GOODWIN Julia | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 24 | ARIF Haniya | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
| 25 | LIAO Audrey | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 26 | MATSUEDA Kylie | 30% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 27 | KOHLI Jiya | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.