Kansas City, MO - Kansas City, MO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HUSISIAN Hadley N. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
2 | JOYCE Michaela | - | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 70% |
3 | LIN Jessica Y. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 73% |
3 | PARK Faith K. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% |
5 | WANG Elizabeth | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
6 | KHROL Jaclyn | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 37% |
7 | KHAMIS Yasmine A. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 45% |
8 | LEUNG Natalie | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
9 | BOYS Nishta B. | - | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
10 | OXENREIDER Tierna A. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% | |
11 | KETKAR Ketki | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
12 | NGUYEN Kaylin A. | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
13 | XU Grace (XinYi) | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 2% |
14 | GANDHI Sedna S. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 28% | |
15 | BELSLEY Devon K. | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
16 | WANG anne | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 2% |
17 | WEISS Talia L. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
18 | ZAFFT Tatiana M. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
19 | MCLANE Lauren | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 24% |
20 | TYLER Syd | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
21 | WATRALL Christina | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
22 | EBRAHIM Ameera H. | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - | |
23 | DESAMOURS Sabine I. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% |
24 | GRESHAM Rebekah L. | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
25 | TSANG JAFFE Avi | 4% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
26 | FALLON Kyle R. | 2% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
27 | SEMIKIN Julia | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
28 | LIN Katie Y. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 8% |
29 | ZHANG Tina | - | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
30 | LEE Michelle J. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
31 | SAAL Anna | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% | - |
32 | REID Anousheh | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
33 | WHITTEMORE Lucy K. | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% | |
34 | O'DONNELL Amanda A. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% | |
35 | LEE Sumin | - | 1% | 8% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 8% |
36 | WOLF Isabella A. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
37 | NING Emma | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 6% |
38 | BARNES Olivia R. | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% | - |
39 | KUNDU Anisha | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | - |
40 | GU Sarah | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
41 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% | |
42 | ZHU Chenxi (Heidi) | - | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% |
43 | CHEN Zhengnan(Janet) | - | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
44 | MALDONADO Pilar I. | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 39% | 13% | |
45 | WU Amelia | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% | |
46 | MILEWSKI Nicole | 3% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
47 | BEI Karen | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
47 | KOWALSKY Rachel A. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | - |
49 | MILLETTE Marie Frederique | - | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
50 | BALAKRISHNAN Monica S. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
51 | CHAN Cheri K. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 2% |
52 | MACHULSKY Leehi | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 23% |
53 | DESAI Meera P. | 3% | 18% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
54 | PAPADAKIS Lily | 11% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
54 | CHIN Isabella | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
56 | COBERT Helen G. | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
57 | LONG Cindy | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
58 | MAO Amy | 4% | 19% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
59 | PATURU Meghana | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 22% | |
60 | POIRIER Ariane | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | |
61 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
62 | YANG Miranda (Yinuo) | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% | |
63 | WANG Nora | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
64 | MEHROTRA Anya | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
65 | KIM Diane E. | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
66 | WANG Karen | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
67 | SHEN Stephanie | - | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
68 | KUZNETSOV Victoria | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 4% |
69 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
70 | KETKAR Mallika | - | 3% | 13% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 5% |
71 | SMUK Daria A. | 6% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
71 | GRESHAM Sarah L. | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
73 | LEE kyungmin | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
74 | REID Sobia | 2% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
75 | LAVERY Chloe K. | 9% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
76 | CHANG Ella | 2% | 30% | 41% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
77 | LEE Olive | 1% | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
78 | ZHENG Ava | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
79 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
80 | DE JAGER Celine | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
81 | LABBE Kathryn M. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 4% |
82 | HUNTER Madison | 14% | 33% | 32% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
83 | BENATER Lauren | 2% | 13% | 28% | 31% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
84 | JOYAL Anne-Sophie | 46% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
85 | JANOWSKI Madeline (Madeline Janowski) A. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | - |
86 | QURESHI Aafreen | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
86 | CORDERO Allison | 22% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
88 | AHUJA Arianna | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
89 | ZAKHAROV Anne E. | 15% | 44% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
90 | JIN Jasmine | - | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - |
91 | HU Grace | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
92 | SMITH Grace L. | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
93 | MCCUTCHEN Lauren (Lulu) | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
94 | MUCSI Angela Lilla | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
95 | ZHOU Lei | 34% | 44% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
96 | FENG Kelly L. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
96 | LIN Waiyuk | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 26% | 11% | 2% |
98 | BURN Lauren M. | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
98 | SHUM Jessica | 17% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
100 | RUNIONS Emersyn | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% |
101 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
102 | SLACKMAN Valerie | - | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - |
103 | KIM Erika S. | 4% | 33% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
104 | REITINGER Emilie B. | 1% | 14% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
104 | KWON Athina | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
106 | SON Katherine (Injee) | 4% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
107 | VANDERLINDEN Mira | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
108 | LIU Christina A. | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 1% |
109 | MYERS Jeanelle Christina A. | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
110 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
111 | ZUHARS Renee A. | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% | |
111 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
113 | DARANOUVONG Logan | 12% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | |
114 | ZHANG mickey | 26% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
115 | SHAH Chloe | 26% | 45% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
115 | KOKES Ava | 10% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
117 | SHERTZ Kira E. | 31% | 45% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
118 | ANDERSON Nora E. | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
118 | HENRY Asha S. | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
120 | GAURIAT Jade S. | 29% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
121 | HUANG Hannah T. | 6% | 42% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
121 | YU Bailey | 16% | 42% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
123 | ZENG Katrina | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
124 | BOLES Savvianna | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
125 | TONG Sarah Shen | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
126 | TAYLOR Kiera S. | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | |
127 | HAMILTON Nina M. | 18% | 42% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
128 | CHAN Elizabeth | 1% | 9% | 23% | 32% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
129 | HONG Elaine | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
130 | LONGSTREET Olivia | 84% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
131 | RAUSCH Juliana | 6% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
132 | SINGH Aayushi | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
133 | LI Michelle | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
134 | CARBO laura | 77% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
135 | CARLSON Ava | 29% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.