Kansas City, MO - Kansas City, MO, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 66% |
| 2 | GREENBAUM Ella K. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 54% | 22% | 4% |
| 3 | KIM Zoe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% |
| 3 | LU Vivian Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 32% |
| 5 | DI PERNA Chiara I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% |
| 6 | SULLIVAN Siobhan R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 21% |
| 7 | FOUR-GARCIA Madison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% |
| 8 | OLSEN Natalie J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 18% | 2% |
| 9 | OISHI Megumi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
| 10 | LEE Alexandra B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% |
| 11 | TONG Kunling | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 18% |
| 12 | WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 46% |
| 13 | WILLIAMS Chloe C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% |
| 14 | TIMOFEYEV Nicole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 53% | 9% |
| 15 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 26% |
| 16 | BEALE Zoe M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
| 17 | NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 11% |
| 18 | CHAN Audrey | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 19 | CHIN Erika J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 23% |
| 20 | POSSICK Lola P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 41% |
| 21 | DUNGEY Amelia S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
| 22 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 3% |
| 23 | JULIEN Michelle | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 24 | BOIS Adele | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 5% |
| 25 | LACSON Sarah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 36% | 9% |
| 26 | PAK Kaitlyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% |
| 26 | ZIELINSKI Isabella G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 28 | STONE Hava S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 8% |
| 29 | CHING Sapphira S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 5% |
| 30 | CODY Alexandra C. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 31 | KOBOZEVA Tamara V. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 32 | SATHYANATH Kailing | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 6% |
| 33 | KALRA Himani V. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 34 | TZOU Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% |
| 35 | CHEEMA Sophia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 4% |
| 36 | TUCKER Iman R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 5% |
| 37 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 7% |
| 38 | CHIOLDI Mina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 35% | 8% |
| 39 | ENGELMAN Madeline A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% |
| 40 | VESTEL Mira B. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
| 41 | BUHAY Rachel T. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 42 | TANG Annie L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 7% |
| 43 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 41% | 11% |
| 44 | FLOREZ Melissa | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 48% | 18% | 3% |
| 44 | NEWELL Alexia C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 14% | 1% |
| 46 | MOZHAEVA MARIA | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 21% | 3% |
| 47 | YAP Madeline | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% | 2% |
| 48 | CHANG Josephine S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
| 49 | YONG Erika E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 18% |
| 50 | HE Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 33% | 7% |
| 51 | KATZ Anat | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
| 51 | FERRARI-BRIDGERS Marinella O. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 12% | 1% |
| 53 | GUTHIKONDA Nithya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 21% |
| 53 | KOO Samantha | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 55 | SINHA Anika | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 56 | LI Victoria J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% | 2% |
| 56 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 58 | YANG Angelina | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 59 | CHEN Xinyan | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 60 | TANG Catherine H. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 61 | XI Shining | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 62 | OXENSTIERNA Carolina | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 13% | 1% |
| 62 | DUCKETT Madison | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 64 | KALINICHENKO Alexandra (Sasha) | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 65 | NEIBART Fiona | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 66 | LUKASHENKO Angelina | 100% | 100% | 92% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 66 | REDDY Shreya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 28% | 4% |
| 68 | TAO Hannah J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 69 | BAKER Audrey C. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 70 | SHOMAN Jenna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% |
| 71 | YANG Ashley M. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 37% | 12% | 2% |
| 72 | MIKA Veronica | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 54% | 22% | 4% |
| 73 | ATLURI Sara V. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 74 | BALMASEDA Sabrina F. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 75 | BLUM Leah I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
| 76 | KIM Sujin | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 77 | HILD Nisha | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 78 | KONG Isabel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
| 79 | MATAIEV Natalie S. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 79 | FEARNS Zara A. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 79 | SHOMAN Miriam | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 11% | - |
| 82 | HOVERMAN Hannah A. | 100% | 92% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 83 | ANDRES Katherine A. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 37% | 12% | 2% |
| 83 | HUANG Sharon | 100% | 100% | 88% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 85 | PRIEUR Lauren | 100% | 100% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 86 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 87 | RIZKALA Joanna | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 88 | HURST Kennedy | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 89 | CAO Stephanie X. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 12% |
| 90 | LIN Selena | 100% | 93% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 91 | NYSTROM Sofia C. | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 92 | WEI Vivian W. | 100% | 92% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 93 | NOVICK Mia J. | 100% | 98% | 67% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 94 | BHATTACHARJEE Rhea | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 95 | MARSEE Samantha | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 96 | BENOIT Adelaide L. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 97 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 98 | LARIMER Katherine E. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 99 | WU Erica L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 32% | 6% |
| 100 | HOLMES Emma | 100% | 79% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 101 | DARINGA Arianna | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 101 | CANNON Sophia E. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
| 103 | BILILIES Sophia | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 104 | LIGH Erenei J. | 100% | 87% | 55% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 105 | SHIN Andrea Y. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 106 | CHIANG Emily | 100% | 94% | 56% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 107 | CALVERT Sarah-Jane E. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 108 | CHANG Emily | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 1% |
| 109 | LIN Zhiyin | 100% | 84% | 49% | 19% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 110 | NG Sarah W. | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 111 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 100% | 98% | 74% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 112 | DHAR Aamina | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 113 | TODD Phoebe | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 114 | ZINNI Kaylyn M. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 115 | SIMONIAN Olivia A. | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 116 | ROGERS Pauline E. | 100% | 91% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 116 | BOLTON Eleksi M. | 100% | 94% | 51% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 116 | OBRADOVIC Ana | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 119 | LEE Sophia | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 120 | RAHIM Alina O. | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 121 | WHEELER Kira | 100% | 53% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 122 | KRYLOVA Valery | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 122 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 124 | GIRARDI Aemilia | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 125 | XIKES Katherine E. | 100% | 96% | 72% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 126 | HSU Mia Y. | 100% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 127 | GORMAN Victoria M. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 128 | ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 129 | KITTLE Lauren | 100% | 57% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 130 | MUNGOVAN Cecilia C. | 100% | 85% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 131 | ZENG Xiaoyi | 100% | 67% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 131 | RANGANATHAN Ruchi | 100% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 133 | BAKER Amelia M. | 100% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 133 | LU Amy | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 133 | DAVIS Charlotte | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 136 | HUNG Anna | 100% | 90% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 136 | CUNNINGHAM Erin | 100% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 138 | LI Angela | 100% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 139 | PROBST Alyssa | 100% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 140 | LIGH Karis | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.