Kansas City, MO - Kansas City, MO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | ||
1 | WASHINGTON Isis | - | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 76% | ||||||
2 | HURLEY Courtney L. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 41% | ||||||
3 | VAN BRUMMEN Anna C. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 60% | ||||||
3 | CEBULA Anne | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 1% | ||||||
5 | GUZZI VINCENTI Margherita A. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 42% | 18% | ||||||
6 | LIN Jessica Y. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 55% | ||||||
7 | BATES Cassandra L. | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 5% | ||||||
8 | NIXON Catherine (Kasia) D. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 26% | ||||||
9 | BASSA Francesca A. | - | - | 3% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% | ||||||
10 | HOLMES Katharine (Kat) W. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% | ||||||
11 | VIE Natalie J. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% | ||||||
11 | ZUIKOVA Veronika | - | - | - | - | - | 1% | 4% | 11% | 21% | 27% | 23% | 11% | 2% |
13 | LURYE Sarah | - | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% | 1% | ||||||
14 | HURLEY Kelley A. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 25% | |||||||
15 | LEE Sumin | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - | ||||||
16 | YEFREMENKO Dariya (Dasha) | - | - | - | - | 2% | 6% | 15% | 23% | 25% | 18% | 8% | 2% | - |
17 | PARK Faith K. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 25% | ||||||
18 | JOYCE Michaela | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% | ||||||
19 | KUNJAN Lena R. | 1% | 7% | 17% | 25% | 24% | 16% | 8% | 3% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
20 | ZHENG Ava | - | 1% | 4% | 11% | 20% | 25% | 21% | 12% | 5% | 1% | - | - | - |
21 | WATRALL Christina | - | - | - | 2% | 7% | 16% | 25% | 25% | 16% | 6% | 1% | - | |
22 | CHIMAHUSKY Rebecca | - | - | - | - | 1% | 4% | 12% | 22% | 28% | 22% | 10% | 2% | |
23 | HUSISIAN Hadley N. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | ||||||
24 | PIRKOWSKI Amanda L. | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% | ||||||
25 | YEU Irene | - | - | - | - | - | 2% | 6% | 14% | 24% | 27% | 19% | 7% | 1% |
26 | KETKAR Ketki | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 2% | ||||||
26 | KHAMIS Yasmine A. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | ||||||
28 | VERMEULE Emily | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% | ||||||
29 | CONSTANTINO Lola | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 9% | ||||||
30 | GRADY Miriam A. | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% | ||||||
31 | MO Victoria | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 1% | ||||||
32 | RAUSCH Ariana (Ari) M. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% | ||||||
33 | NAHAPETYAN Datev | - | - | - | - | - | 1% | 3% | 10% | 20% | 27% | 24% | 12% | 3% |
34 | NIXON Caroline (Karolina) L. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 3% | ||||||
35 | CANDREVA Greta H. | - | 1% | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% | ||||||
36 | ZAFFT Tatiana M. | - | - | - | 1% | 4% | 10% | 19% | 25% | 22% | 13% | 5% | 1% | - |
37 | BEIHOLD Emily M. | 2% | 10% | 22% | 27% | 22% | 12% | 4% | 1% | < 1% | - | - | - | - |
38 | BALAKRISHNAN Monica S. | - | - | - | 3% | 8% | 17% | 25% | 24% | 15% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
39 | BULAVKO Sonia | - | - | - | 1% | 4% | 11% | 20% | 24% | 21% | 12% | 4% | 1% | - |
40 | GU Sarah | - | 1% | 5% | 13% | 22% | 25% | 19% | 10% | 4% | 1% | - | - | - |
41 | TOBY Natalia R. | - | - | - | 2% | 6% | 13% | 21% | 24% | 19% | 10% | 4% | 1% | - |
42 | BEDDINGFIELD Claire E. | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% | ||||||
43 | KOMAR Sofia | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 2% | ||||||
44 | SCALA Emma | - | - | - | 1% | 5% | 14% | 23% | 26% | 19% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
45 | CHIN Isabella | - | - | 1% | 5% | 12% | 21% | 24% | 20% | 11% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
46 | YAMANAKA Mina | - | - | - | 1% | 4% | 10% | 18% | 24% | 22% | 14% | 5% | 1% | - |
47 | TYLER Syd | - | - | 1% | 5% | 13% | 21% | 24% | 19% | 11% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
48 | GRESHAM Sarah L. | - | 1% | 4% | 10% | 19% | 24% | 21% | 13% | 5% | 1% | - | - | - |
49 | LEE Michelle J. | - | - | 1% | 3% | 8% | 17% | 23% | 23% | 15% | 7% | 2% | - | - |
50 | BUCUR Rebekah O. | - | - | - | 1% | 4% | 12% | 21% | 26% | 21% | 11% | 3% | 1% | - |
51 | PROVENZA Hannah G. | - | - | - | 1% | 4% | 11% | 21% | 27% | 22% | 11% | 3% | - | |
51 | KHROL Jaclyn | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 1% | ||||||
53 | PATURU Meghana | - | - | 3% | 9% | 18% | 25% | 23% | 14% | 6% | 2% | - | - | - |
54 | MEHROTRA Anya | - | 1% | 6% | 15% | 24% | 25% | 18% | 8% | 3% | - | - | - | |
55 | BEITTEL Chloe F. | - | - | - | 2% | 7% | 15% | 23% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 2% | - | - |
55 | GANDHI Sedna S. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 8% | 17% | 26% | 25% | 15% | 6% | 1% | - |
57 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | - | 3% | 10% | 21% | 27% | 22% | 12% | 4% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
58 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | - | - | - | 2% | 6% | 14% | 22% | 25% | 18% | 9% | 3% | - | - |
58 | GREGORY Elizabeth | - | - | 1% | 3% | 9% | 18% | 24% | 22% | 14% | 6% | 2% | - | - |
60 | MONTOYA Kimberlee C. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% | ||||||
61 | CHRETIEN PAULINE | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2% | 7% | 17% | 28% | 27% | 15% | 3% |
62 | HAMILTON Pauline S. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 12% | 20% | 24% | 20% | 12% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
63 | MACHULSKY Leehi | - | - | - | 1% | 4% | 11% | 20% | 25% | 22% | 12% | 4% | 1% | - |
64 | HU Grace | - | 1% | 6% | 16% | 25% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 2% | - | - | - | |
65 | LANDWEHR Helen B. | - | 2% | 7% | 16% | 24% | 24% | 17% | 8% | 3% | 1% | - | - | - |
66 | LOMBARD Ella | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |||||||
67 | KUZNETSOV Victoria | - | 1% | 5% | 13% | 22% | 25% | 19% | 10% | 3% | 1% | - | - | |
68 | XU Grace (XinYi) | - | 2% | 9% | 18% | 25% | 23% | 14% | 6% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
69 | SHAMSIAN Shaya | - | - | 2% | 8% | 16% | 23% | 23% | 16% | 8% | 2% | - | - | - |
70 | HARRISON Amelia H. | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2% | 7% | 17% | 26% | 27% | 16% | 4% |
71 | NGUYEN Kaylin A. | - | 2% | 8% | 17% | 24% | 23% | 16% | 8% | 2% | 1% | - | - | - |
71 | BENATER Lauren | - | 2% | 8% | 17% | 25% | 24% | 15% | 7% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
73 | LIU Christina A. | 1% | 5% | 15% | 25% | 26% | 17% | 8% | 2% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
74 | TIKHONOVA Julia | - | - | 1% | 5% | 13% | 21% | 24% | 19% | 11% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
75 | LEUNG Natalie | - | - | 2% | 7% | 16% | 23% | 23% | 17% | 8% | 3% | 1% | - | - |
76 | WU Amelia | - | - | 1% | 5% | 13% | 21% | 24% | 19% | 11% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
77 | MCLANE Lauren | - | - | 1% | 4% | 11% | 20% | 25% | 21% | 13% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
78 | BRILL Sophie | - | 1% | 5% | 14% | 23% | 25% | 18% | 9% | 3% | 1% | - | - | - |
79 | WILEY Erica | - | 1% | 3% | 10% | 20% | 25% | 22% | 13% | 5% | 1% | - | - | |
80 | LIVERANT Jordan S. | - | 1% | 3% | 10% | 19% | 24% | 22% | 13% | 6% | 2% | - | - | - |
81 | MCCUTCHEN Lauren (Lulu) | - | 3% | 11% | 21% | 25% | 21% | 12% | 5% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
81 | WANG Elizabeth | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - | ||||||
83 | LEIGHTON Eleanor T. | - | 3% | 10% | 20% | 26% | 22% | 13% | 5% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
84 | O'DONNELL Amanda A. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 4% | 11% | 21% | 27% | 22% | 11% | 3% | - |
85 | CHEN Zhengnan(Janet) | - | - | - | 1% | 3% | 9% | 18% | 24% | 23% | 15% | 6% | 1% | - |
86 | KETKAR Mallika | - | - | 1% | 5% | 12% | 21% | 25% | 20% | 11% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
86 | WANG Karen | - | - | - | 1% | 3% | 8% | 16% | 24% | 24% | 16% | 7% | 1% | - |
88 | WANG anne | - | 3% | 11% | 21% | 25% | 21% | 12% | 5% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
89 | KOWALSKY Rachel A. | - | 2% | 7% | 17% | 25% | 24% | 16% | 7% | 2% | - | - | - | |
90 | MARTUS Cosima O. | - | - | 2% | 7% | 16% | 23% | 23% | 17% | 8% | 3% | 1% | - | - |
91 | FALLON Kyle R. | - | 2% | 9% | 19% | 25% | 23% | 14% | 6% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
92 | CROCKET Anne R. | - | 1% | 3% | 10% | 19% | 25% | 21% | 13% | 5% | 2% | - | - | - |
93 | MUCSI Anna M. | - | 1% | 5% | 13% | 22% | 25% | 19% | 10% | 3% | 1% | - | - | |
94 | KIM Diane E. | - | - | 2% | 6% | 14% | 23% | 25% | 18% | 9% | 3% | 1% | - | - |
95 | CHAN Elizabeth | - | 2% | 8% | 18% | 26% | 24% | 15% | 6% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
96 | BROOKS Tean R. | - | 1% | 4% | 12% | 22% | 26% | 20% | 10% | 3% | 1% | - | - | - |
97 | AHUJA Arianna | - | 3% | 11% | 21% | 26% | 21% | 12% | 4% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
98 | GAO Aretha R. | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 2% | ||||||
99 | BUCKINGHAM Emma N. | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% | ||||||
100 | MYERS Helen Sophia A. | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% | ||||||
101 | SZPAK Lara K. | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |||||||
102 | CHOI Lyla | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% | |||||||
103 | ZUHARS Renee A. | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 3% | ||||||
104 | LIN Katie Y. | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% | ||||||
105 | DUNLAP-SMITH Azaline I. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 9% | ||||||
106 | YOON Julia J. | 5% | 21% | 32% | 26% | 12% | 3% | - | ||||||
107 | ZMURK Emma M. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% | ||||||
108 | BINDAS Blodwen S. | - | 4% | 15% | 29% | 31% | 17% | 4% | ||||||
109 | HEDVAT Alexis S. | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 8% | 1% | ||||||
110 | ROBERTSON Lily | 6% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 9% | 1% | - | ||||||
111 | IGOE Nirali B. | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% | ||||||
112 | MYERS Jeanelle Christina A. | 15% | 34% | 31% | 15% | 4% | - | - | ||||||
113 | OXENREIDER Tierna A. | - | 1% | 5% | 16% | 32% | 33% | 14% | ||||||
114 | RUNIONS Emersyn | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% | ||||||
115 | HEINRICH Eva | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - | ||||||
116 | PYO Yunice | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | ||||||
117 | KUNDU Anisha | 5% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - | ||||||
118 | PROVANCE Amanda R. | 11% | 31% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - | ||||||
119 | GRESHAM Rebekah L. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |||||||
120 | PROCTOR Sara J. | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% | ||||||
121 | KULKARNI Diya | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 1% | ||||||
122 | YANG Miranda (Yinuo) | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% | ||||||
123 | SMUK Daria A. | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - | ||||||
124 | BEI Karen | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | ||||||
125 | SEMIKIN Julia | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | ||||||
126 | TONG Sarah Shen | 11% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - | ||||||
127 | FENG Kelly L. | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - | ||||||
128 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | 4% | 17% | 30% | 29% | 15% | 4% | - | ||||||
128 | NING Emma | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 5% | ||||||
130 | ZHANG Tina | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% | ||||||
131 | WANG Nora | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% | ||||||
132 | DESAMOURS Sabine I. | 1% | 9% | 24% | 32% | 23% | 9% | 1% | ||||||
133 | LABBE Kathryn M. | 1% | 6% | 18% | 31% | 28% | 13% | 3% | ||||||
134 | BOYS Nishta B. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | ||||||
135 | LIM Clarice | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 2% | ||||||
136 | HENRY Asha S. | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 2% | - | ||||||
137 | ACHTERBERG Samantha (Sammy) K. | 4% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 4% | - | ||||||
138 | BARRY Julia E. | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | |||||||
139 | SCHMIDT Lori M. | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% | ||||||
140 | MALDONADO Pilar I. | 1% | 5% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 3% | ||||||
141 | RATZLAFF Jocelyn T. | - | 4% | 15% | 29% | 31% | 17% | 4% | ||||||
142 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 26% | 11% | 2% | ||||||
143 | TAO Olivia A. | 5% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - | ||||||
144 | WHITTEMORE Lucy K. | 2% | 10% | 25% | 32% | 22% | 8% | 1% | ||||||
144 | BELSLEY Devon K. | 15% | 34% | 31% | 15% | 4% | 1% | - | ||||||
146 | TAYLOR Audrey Y. | 2% | 10% | 24% | 32% | 23% | 8% | 1% | ||||||
147 | COBERT Helen G. | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - | ||||||
148 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% | ||||||
149 | SCANLAN Susannah (Susie) | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 4% | ||||||
150 | LUONG Shirley | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - | ||||||
150 | LEANG Andrea K. | 3% | 15% | 30% | 30% | 17% | 5% | 1% | ||||||
152 | NI Emma | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 1% | ||||||
153 | SIBLEY Elisabeth J. | 19% | 37% | 29% | 12% | 3% | - | - | ||||||
154 | PRIMES Amanda M. | 14% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 4% | 1% | - | ||||||
154 | WEISS Talia L. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% | 1% | ||||||
156 | QURESHI Aafreen | 22% | 39% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - | ||||||
156 | LEE kyungmin | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - | ||||||
158 | CHU Audrey | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - | ||||||
159 | MILLETTE Marie Frederique | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 26% | 11% | 2% | ||||||
160 | WALLACE Katherine C. | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - | ||||||
161 | GLASSNER Sophia Rose S. | 25% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |||||||
162 | KWON Athina | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 2% | ||||||
163 | SLACKMAN Valerie | 31% | 41% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - | - | ||||||
164 | GUPTA Ananya B. | 17% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - | ||||||
165 | TONCHEVA Victoria M. | - | < 1% | 3% | 12% | 29% | 37% | 19% | ||||||
166 | LONG Cindy | 3% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - | ||||||
167 | ISAKSEN Isabella | 36% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - | ||||||
167 | LEE Olive | 5% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | ||||||
169 | BARNES Olivia R. | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - | ||||||
170 | BOWIE Charlotta | 21% | 38% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - | ||||||
171 | ADVINCULA Anabella E. | 15% | 35% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - | ||||||
172 | JANOWSKI Madeline (Madeline Janowski) A. | 3% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - | ||||||
173 | WOLF Isabella A. | 2% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 7% | 1% | ||||||
174 | O'REILLY Aeryn E. | 2% | 12% | 27% | 31% | 20% | 7% | 1% | ||||||
175 | SOIN Anika A. | 30% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - | ||||||
176 | WEISS Olivia | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | ||||||
177 | CHAN Cheri K. | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% | ||||||
178 | MAYER Ingrid V. | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - | ||||||
179 | SMITH Grace L. | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |||||||
180 | VANDERLINDEN Mira | 28% | 41% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - | - | ||||||
181 | MILEWSKI Nicole | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | |||||||
182 | KIM Natalie S. | 32% | 40% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - | - | ||||||
183 | TIMMONS Sarah J. | 4% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 4% | - | ||||||
184 | DICKINSON Alexandra P. | 2% | 11% | 27% | 32% | 21% | 7% | 1% | ||||||
185 | LIN Julia L. | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.