Kansas City, MO - Kansas City, MO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JEAN Noe T. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
| 2 | MOSZCZYNSKI Adam | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 14% |
| 3 | ERACHSHAW Taras P. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 3 | PORTMANN Stein J. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 6% |
| 5 | PAN Jack (Yuxiang) | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 37% | |
| 6 | WESLER Logan A. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 7 | MICHELL Bailey | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% |
| 8 | LEVIN Mark A. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
| 9 | TRAVERS Samir T. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% | |
| 10 | DESAI Drewv D. | - | 3% | 11% | 26% | 33% | 21% | 6% |
| 11 | REYES Xavier M. | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 12 | HOUTZ Jackson | 1% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
| 13 | ZU Kevin | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 39% |
| 14 | NEUHEARDT Peter | 1% | 5% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 3% |
| 15 | KOTOV Leonid | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 16 | NARANJO David E. | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 17 | LIU David J. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 9% |
| 18 | SMITLEY Tyler J. | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 19 | BACON Elias (Eli) H. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 33% |
| 20 | RAJA Arnav | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 21 | GANTA Vijay | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
| 22 | MOSKOWITZ Mason C. | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 4% |
| 23 | LE Hayden | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 24 | WINKLER Lucas G. | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% |
| 25 | TRINH Trevor Z. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 26 | ESCUETA Tony V. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% |
| 27 | ASHBY Ethan J. | - | 1% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 28 | WILDMAN John | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
| 29 | GILMORE Thomas W. | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 30% | 16% | 3% |
| 30 | KAYDALIN Artyom | - | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% | |
| 31 | TANG Alex Y. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 32 | HONG Vincent Q. | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 33 | TRAVAGLIONE Conor D. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% |
| 34 | TANN Justin | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
| 35 | PAN Jerry | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 36 | GINIS Nathan | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 37 | LI Joshua L. | - | 4% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 38 | BUKOWSKI Bronson | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 39% | 13% |
| 39 | SLOCOMBE Xavier | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 40 | TANG Brendan J. | - | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 41 | MAGUIRE Matthew V. | 3% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
| 42 | RAI Avin | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
| 43 | POPE Nico | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 44 | ZHANG Jeffrey | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 45 | YANG Richard | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 4% |
| 46 | NG Jonathan H. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 15% |
| 47 | HJERPE Wade H. | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 47 | GREEN IV James (Bud) | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 12% | |
| 49 | HASNAH Henry | 1% | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 50 | BRAR Sanjeet | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 51 | ELIN Adam E. | 5% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 52 | RABINKOV Anthony | 8% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 53 | LASORSA Matthew | - | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 16% |
| 54 | MAKLIN Edward P. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 55 | CHO Brandon | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
| 56 | MORTON-SALMON Sasha | 11% | 39% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 57 | CHEONG Heonjae | 2% | 11% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 7% | 1% |
| 58 | WU Nicholas R. | 2% | 10% | 25% | 32% | 22% | 8% | 1% |
| 59 | HONG Steven | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 60 | GEORGE Daniel | 22% | 49% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 61 | FREYRE DE ANDRADE Elian R. | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 62 | ALTIRS Alexander | 7% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 63 | SUN David | 48% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 64 | KOSURI Harsha | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 65 | KORINTH Alexander J. | 23% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | MYERS Kaleb S. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 67 | GILLIGAN Wolff | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 68 | ZHOU Miles | 1% | 16% | 35% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 69 | HENSHAW Joseph | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
| 70 | WANG Charles | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 71 | HUANG Ethan F. | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
| 72 | KOKKIN Jack S. | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 73 | GAFFNEY John M. | 4% | 19% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 74 | RASMUSSEN Alexzander C. | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 74 | CORTINO Mathieu | 1% | 8% | 23% | 32% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 76 | BERRIO Carter E. | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 77 | CHAN Matthew | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 40% | 19% |
| 78 | CHANG Colin S. | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 79 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 80 | ERMAKOV Lev | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 6% |
| 81 | DEWEY Charles J. | 2% | 12% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 82 | LEITH Jack | 27% | 45% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 83 | JUNG Junhwan | 1% | 11% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 84 | TONG ZACHARY | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 85 | VILLARREAL Mateo | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 86 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | 4% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
| 87 | LEONARD Cole | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 88 | ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. | 5% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 89 | ZHOU Brian | 1% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 90 | ESCUETA Jr Antonio V. | 2% | 16% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 90 | REED Samuel J. | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 92 | XU William | 6% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 93 | ALKIN Isaac | 9% | 28% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 94 | WILLIAMS Chris | 3% | 18% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 95 | LIN Andrew | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 96 | FENG Leo | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 97 | KIM Alexander M. | - | < 1% | 2% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 15% |
| 98 | CHAN Chaplin Cheuk Lun | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 99 | BOURGHOL Matthew | 15% | 44% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 99 | XU Luke | 9% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 101 | YUN Jake | 2% | 10% | 26% | 32% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 102 | NGUYEN Andrew | 18% | 36% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 103 | PANDEY Neil | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 104 | REN Richard | 31% | 43% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 104 | PITTS Connor | 48% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 106 | WINEBURNER J.T. | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 107 | SIBILLA Gopal | 27% | 46% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 108 | GUTSCHKE Braxton | 76% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 109 | LOPEZ Lucas M. | 49% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 109 | POLSER John | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.