Northwest Fencing Center - Tigard, OR, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | LANGE Henry C. | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 76% |
| 2 | BREILING Niklas | - | 2% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 8% |
| 3 | CRANOR Erich L. | - | 21% | 54% | 22% | 2% | |
| 3 | HUANG Thomas | - | - | 4% | 33% | 54% | 10% |
| 5 | DESSAUER Tobyn M. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 37% | 55% |
| 6 | TIKHONOV Ilia | - | - | 7% | 42% | 44% | 6% |
| 7 | GULLO Kenji Y. | - | - | 10% | 48% | 38% | 4% |
| 8 | ST CLAIR Soren | 21% | 47% | 28% | 4% | < 1% | - |
| 9 | DU SHUNYU K. | - | 1% | 6% | 29% | 49% | 15% |
| 10 | REID Brentwood P. | - | 2% | 19% | 61% | 18% | |
| 11 | BREILING Sebastian | 5% | 32% | 44% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 12 | BALDWIN Seth K. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 40% | 49% |
| 13 | REILLY August | 33% | 52% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
| 14 | BAXTER Daniel J. | - | - | 7% | 28% | 43% | 22% |
| 15 | KROGH Daniel (Dan) M. | - | 1% | 14% | 51% | 30% | 3% |
| 16 | LARSEN Samuel F. | - | < 1% | 8% | 38% | 53% | |
| 17 | ROBERTS Peter | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 14% |
| 18 | MATHES Caleb | 2% | 54% | 37% | 7% | - | |
| 19 | ST.CLAIRE-KING Tenzin | 1% | 9% | 32% | 42% | 15% | 1% |
| 20 | ELDER Emily | 15% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 21 | CASONI Calder | 40% | 55% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 22 | NELSON Davis | - | 9% | 61% | 27% | 3% | - |
| 23 | GILLER Irving | - | 5% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 4% |
| 24 | GARID Erkhemkhuu | 3% | 31% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 25 | CALKINS Logan | 95% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 26 | BALDWIN Ruth | 60% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 27 | HARTRANFT Scott | 21% | 48% | 28% | 3% | - | - |
| 28 | CRETEN joachim | 44% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 29 | PARIKH Parth | 52% | 45% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.