Treasure Island YMCA - San Francisco, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM Rylie | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 33% |
| 2 | MAHAPATRA Alisha | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 49% |
| 3 | CHUNG Charlotte | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 41% | 31% |
| 3 | LI Claire | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 10% | 1% |
| 5 | KO Alyssa | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 43% | 18% |
| 6 | SHU Kayla | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 7 | GOWDA Adisha | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% |
| 8 | CHANG Audrey | 3% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
| 9 | TUNG Alison | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 4% |
| 10 | TAGNE Zoey | - | 4% | 15% | 29% | 31% | 17% | 4% |
| 11 | ZHAI Muyan | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 44% | 29% |
| 12 | GU Alexandra | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 13 | LEE Madison | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 39% | 11% |
| 14 | XIA Emily | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 28% | 6% |
| 15 | SUN Leia | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 16 | GAO Nicole | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 17 | PICACHE Camilla | 4% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 18 | DING Athena | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 6% |
| 19 | CHEN Chloe | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 4% |
| 20 | SUN Zoey | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 21 | SINGH Aditi | 21% | 38% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 22 | CHENG Jessica | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 23 | YANG Lucy | 8% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 24 | MARENITCH Kara | - | 4% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 4% |
| 25 | DU Zoey | - | 2% | 11% | 26% | 33% | 21% | 6% |
| 26 | SCHOR Katherine | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 27 | ISAAC Felicity | 2% | 11% | 27% | 32% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 28 | NG Genevieve | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 29 | LIN Valentina | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 30 | LOPEZ-HOR Emma Meixian | - | 6% | 25% | 42% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 31 | KIM Olivia | 2% | 13% | 28% | 31% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 32 | ZHONG Mia | 33% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 33 | HOU Alice | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 34 | DONG Ena | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | KNOX aysa | 1% | 10% | 25% | 32% | 22% | 8% | 1% |
| 36 | GOODFELLOW Amelia | 25% | 45% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 37 | GUO Antong | 19% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | MAHAJAN Mira | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 39 | SONI Olivia | 28% | 40% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | CHEN Lyra | < 1% | 4% | 15% | 29% | 31% | 17% | 4% |
| 41 | EUN Seowon | < 1% | 10% | 37% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 42 | AUYEUNG Willow | < 1% | 4% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 6% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.