Manalapan, NJ - Manalapan, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LI Amanda C. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 28% | 44% | 21% |
| 2 | MIKA Veronica | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 48% | 34% |
| 3 | SINHA Anika | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 3 | DUCKETT Madison | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 5 | TURNOF Kayla M. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
| 6 | SATHYANATH Kailing | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
| 7 | DARINGA Arianna | - | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 8 | SOURIMTO Valeria | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 9 | ENGELMAN Madeline A. | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 45% | 30% |
| 10 | FERRARI-BRIDGERS Marinella O. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% |
| 11 | LUKASHENKO Angelina | - | - | 4% | 22% | 41% | 26% | 5% |
| 12 | BAKER Audrey C. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 6% |
| 13 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 47% | 32% |
| 14 | KRYLOVA Valery | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
| 15 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
| 16 | WANG Jianning | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 17 | YAN Ava | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | < 1% | - |
| 18 | DANK Dina | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 19 | RIZKALA Joanna | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
| 20 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 20 | YUAN Greta | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 22 | LIN Selena | 12% | 38% | 34% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 23 | NEWELL Alexia C. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
| 24 | LEE Sophia | - | 4% | 23% | 42% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 25 | SHIH Christina | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 26 | KOO Samantha | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 27 | CUNNINGHAM Erin | 52% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 28 | GIRARDI Aemilia | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 29 | JENKINS Scotland | 3% | 21% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 30 | LIGH Erenei J. | - | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 31 | MAGLIATO Julia | 44% | 42% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 32 | REN Xinling | 8% | 33% | 36% | 18% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 33 | OBRADOVIC Ana | 1% | 7% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 34 | NG Sarah W. | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 35 | CRUZ Sonia | 28% | 43% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | SULLIVAN Caroline | 3% | 19% | 41% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 37 | LI Angela | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | XU JENNY | 45% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 39 | LIGH Karis | 16% | 49% | 28% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 40 | JAVERI Amaya | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 41 | KOTSEN Ava L. | 18% | 49% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 42 | NAYAK Anika | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.