Manalapan, NJ - Manalapan, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KUZNETSOV Victoria | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 34% | |
2 | LONG Cindy | - | - | - | 5% | 41% | 53% | |
3 | CHAN Elizabeth | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 18% | |
3 | MAO Amy | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
5 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 33% |
6 | MING Cynthia | 3% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
7 | KOWALSKY Rachel A. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% | |
8 | TOLBA Salma | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 17% | |
9 | PARTE Isabella B. | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% | |
10 | PAN Michelle | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
11 | COBERT Helen G. | - | - | 5% | 29% | 47% | 19% | |
12 | LIN Julia L. | - | 4% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 6% | |
13 | REID Anousheh | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% | |
14 | CHANG Ella | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
15 | FALLON Kyle R. | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 42% | 22% | 4% |
16 | BONAR Natalia | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | |
17 | CORDERO Allison | 6% | 35% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | |
18 | BELSLEY Devon K. | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% | |
19 | SINGH Aayushi | 29% | 46% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
20 | LU Junyao | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 46% | 23% |
21 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% | |
22 | LI Alisha | 1% | 9% | 36% | 46% | 9% | - | |
23 | XU Amy | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
24 | SLACKMAN Valerie | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
25 | ZENG Katrina | 8% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | |
26 | HONG Elaine | 1% | 10% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - |
27 | DE JAGER Celine | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% | |
28 | LEE Olive | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% | |
29 | GUZZI Jordan | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
30 | WELLS Emily | 14% | 40% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - | |
31 | LEE Anna | 11% | 39% | 37% | 12% | 1% | - | |
32 | ZAKHAROV Anne E. | 9% | 37% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | |
33 | XU Jessica | 16% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
34 | PAN Iris | 38% | 44% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
35 | MA Annie | 10% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 2% | - | |
36 | HILLYER Megan | 14% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
37 | GOGINENI Gamana | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.