Manalapan, NJ - Manalapan, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BOIS Adele | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 5% |
| 2 | GORMAN Victoria M. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% |
| 3 | TAO Hannah J. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% |
| 3 | BROWN Emma | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 4% |
| 5 | KUDRIAVTSEVA Daria | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% |
| 6 | SATHYANATH Kailing | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% |
| 7 | VAN ATTA Grace Y. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% | |
| 8 | MANUBAG Amanda R. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% | |
| 9 | FERRARI-BRIDGERS Marinella O. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
| 10 | WEINBERG Alexandra L. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% |
| 11 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 12 | NEIBART Fiona | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
| 13 | RODGERS Sally E. | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 14 | YANG Ashley M. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 15 | LUKASHENKO Angelina | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 16 | KRYLOVA Valery | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | |
| 17 | DARINGA Arianna | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% | |
| 18 | LIN Selena | 2% | 14% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 19 | BAKER Audrey C. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 20 | HAMMARBERG Shaine Trea | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 2% | |
| 21 | KOO Samantha | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% | |
| 22 | NEWELL Alexia C. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% |
| 23 | O'HARA Eimile J. | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 23 | DANK Dina | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 25 | DUCKETT Madison | 1% | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 26 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
| 27 | LEVITIS Danielle | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% | |
| 28 | YUAN Greta | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 29 | GIRARDI Aemilia | 23% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | LEE Sophia | 8% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 31 | SHIH Christina | 7% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 31 | GUZMAN Claudia | 8% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | ZHANG Judy | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 34 | WANG Jianning | 11% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 35 | PANADIWAL Vedricha | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 36 | REN Xinling | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 37 | LI Angela | 26% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | SHAFFER Eva | 60% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 39 | WHEELER Kira | 5% | 37% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | CUNNINGHAM Erin | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.