Manalapan, NJ - Manalapan, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | EYER Hailey M. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 39% | |
2 | SHA Yi Ling | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 39% | 12% | |
3 | SIMONOV Dasha | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% |
3 | ORVANANOS ANICE | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 44% |
5 | KAPUSTINA Arina | - | - | 2% | 10% | 32% | 42% | 14% |
6 | ROY Layla | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% | |
7 | LIU Angel(Daying) | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 42% | 17% | |
8 | CHOW Annabelle | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 2% |
9 | YANG Iris | - | - | 5% | 22% | 41% | 29% | 4% |
10 | CHEN Renee | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
11 | GOOR Viviene E. | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 18% | |
12 | SHMAY Anastasia | - | 5% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 5% | |
13 | LIAW Elaine | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% | - |
14 | NULAND Zoe | 1% | 10% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% | |
15 | CHEN Thea | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
16 | KAZA Nitya V. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
17 | SHIM Grace | 17% | 46% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
18 | WALOR Riley H. | 27% | 50% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
19 | CHAGARES Isabella | 36% | 45% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
20 | BADLANI Diya | 26% | 49% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
21 | ZHOU Catherine | 10% | 38% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | |
22 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | 8% | 36% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - | |
23 | PAULUS Sloane | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
24 | PEVZNER Nicole | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
25 | PAULUS Isabella | 48% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
26 | CHENG Audrey | 1% | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.