The Fencing Center of San Jose - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | - | 3% | 23% | 47% | 26% | |
2 | LIN Richard | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 57% | |
3 | WILSON Andrew B. | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 19% |
3 | PERGERSON Cole | 1% | 8% | 32% | 42% | 18% | |
5 | ADUG Mathew | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
6 | MAC DULA Hannah | - | 8% | 42% | 42% | 7% | |
7 | STRAKL Ziga | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% |
8 | KAING Selina (Hourng) | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
9 | PATTERSON Natalia | 15% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
10 | POWERS Brenda B. | 40% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | |
11 | PITCHER Katherine "Kacey" | 31% | 49% | 17% | 2% | - | |
12 | LUONG Catherine | 8% | 50% | 34% | 7% | 1% | |
13 | DO Tue | 2% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 2% |
14 | VIET Lani | 6% | 31% | 42% | 19% | 2% | |
15 | GRIFFIN Melissa | 6% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 3% | |
16 | HAN Thi | 3% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.