Hales Gymnasium - Oberlin, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ANA Ionut (Johnny) A. | - | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 35% | 14% |
2 | STEIBER Zane T. | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 15% | |
3 | WILKINSON Derek H. | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
3 | LI Jason Man Kit | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% | |
5 | GOODMAN Zachary | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
6 | PEARSALL Riley C. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
7 | HAYENGA Gary M. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
8 | PROVANCE Amanda R. | 2% | 11% | 26% | 32% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
9 | KAROLAK Dale W. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% |
10 | VANDERLINDEN Brian | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
11 | VANDERLINDEN Mira | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
12 | PROVANCE Allison N. | 2% | 12% | 27% | 31% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
13 | PELKEY Silas | 2% | 18% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
14 | LIU Michelle | 2% | 9% | 23% | 31% | 24% | 9% | 2% |
15 | SHEN Danyating | 1% | 9% | 23% | 32% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
16 | GRAY Henry | 1% | 8% | 23% | 32% | 25% | 10% | 1% |
17 | MEYER Xavier | 4% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 7% | - | |
18 | VOLOTA John S. | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
19 | HEUSER Zoe | 1% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
20 | LANDIS Geoffrey A. | 6% | 25% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
21 | MARSHALL Jacqueline C. | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
23 | SEIFERT Denise | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
25 | TAROLLI Alexander | 19% | 44% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
26 | SUSKI Oscar | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
27 | TURZILLO Mary A. | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.