Sunnyvale, CA - Sunnyvale, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MACHULSKY Leehi | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 47% |
2 | UYANIK Nerine | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 38% | 11% |
3 | LEANG Andrea K. | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 46% | 25% |
3 | BEI Karen | - | - | 2% | 10% | 32% | 42% | 14% |
5 | ROTHMAN-HALL Bronwyn R. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 23% |
6 | TAYLOR Audrey Y. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 26% |
7 | LAN Alice S. | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% | |
8 | GERARDIN Marie | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
9 | MOHABIR Ariane | - | - | 2% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 16% |
10 | ZHANG Chuyi | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
11 | FELAND Alexandra | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
12 | ZUHARS Renee A. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 36% |
13 | BONDAR Nika | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
14 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 45% | 29% |
15 | YAO Yilin | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
16 | POPOVICI Alina B. | - | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - |
17 | WU Amelia | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 40% | 47% |
18 | KIM Zoe L. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 13% | 1% |
19 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% | |
20 | ZHANG mickey | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | |
21 | CHEN Bella | 3% | 32% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
22 | SOIN Anika A. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
23 | LI Charlotte | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
24 | DHILLON Ria | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
25 | JIANG Corina | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 6% | - |
26 | SINHA Zara | 1% | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
27 | YIN Grace | 1% | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
28 | GNANASEKAT Arti | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
29 | HAU Olivia | 12% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - | |
30 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% | - |
31 | CHANG Celine A. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
32 | HABERMAN Hailey | 13% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
33 | WILLIAMS Sarah | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
34 | HSU Adele Y. | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
35 | PACHECO Naomi | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
36 | SIVAGAR Fiona | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% |
37 | LEE Kaitlyn M. | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
38 | JEFFS Dana | 66% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
39 | DHILLON Amani | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
40 | DU Angela | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
41 | KNOX Alexia | 9% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.