Sunnyvale, CA - Sunnyvale, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MACHULSKY Leehi | - | - | - | - | 2% | 25% | 73% |
2 | CHEN Lefu | - | - | - | - | 14% | 86% | |
3 | ROTHMAN-HALL Bronwyn R. | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 45% | 23% | |
3 | BEI Karen | - | - | 3% | 18% | 45% | 33% | |
5 | LAN Alice S. | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 59% | 14% |
6 | ZHANG Chuyi | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
7 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% | |
8 | ZUHARS Renee A. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 49% |
9 | JIANG Corina | - | 2% | 17% | 45% | 32% | 5% | |
10 | KIM Zoe L. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% | |
11 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% | |
12 | GERARDIN Marie | - | - | 4% | 27% | 61% | 8% | |
13 | BONDAR Nika | 1% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
14 | LI Charlotte | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
15 | PACHECO Naomi | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
16 | SINHA Zara | 1% | 8% | 29% | 40% | 19% | 3% | - |
17 | ZHANG mickey | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
18 | FELAND Alexandra | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
19 | POPOVICI Alina B. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
20 | HABERMAN Hailey | 4% | 23% | 42% | 27% | 4% | - | |
21 | DHILLON Ria | 1% | 8% | 34% | 42% | 15% | 1% | |
22 | HSU Adele Y. | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
23 | WILLIAMS Sarah | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
24 | CHANG Celine A. | 2% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
25 | GNANASEKAT Arti | 7% | 30% | 41% | 20% | 2% | - | |
26 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
27 | DHILLON Amani | 2% | 16% | 39% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - |
28 | KULASOORIYA Sonia | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 2% | - |
29 | MUNEYB Muntaha Sana | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
30 | DUONG Zoey | 13% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
31 | DU Angela | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
32 | LEE Kaitlyn M. | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
33 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
34 | SIVAGAR Fiona | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 6% | |
35 | KULASOORIYA Sofia | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
36 | YIN Grace | 22% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
37 | YAO Yilin | 11% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
38 | DALEY Keira | 27% | 43% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
39 | JEFFS Dana | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
40 | WANG Grace | 25% | 46% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
41 | GUPTA Sanya | 30% | 42% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | |
42 | LOUIE Sarah | 26% | 46% | 24% | 3% | - | - | |
43 | HAU Olivia | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - | |
44 | LIN Ashley | 8% | 33% | 41% | 17% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.