Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHANG Yunjia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% |
| 2 | WANG Ellen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 33% | |
| 3 | LUNG Katerina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 38% |
| 3 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 56% | 10% |
| 5 | SHEN Lydia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 45% |
| 6 | KIM Rachael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% |
| 7 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 36% |
| 8 | CHEN Allison V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 63% | 23% |
| 9 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 58% |
| 10 | CHEN Jia P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% |
| 11 | SU Michelle | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 19% | 2% |
| 12 | WU Julianna Y. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 13 | LI Rachel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% |
| 14 | ZHANG Alina C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% | |
| 14 | JANG Kimberley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 26% | |
| 16 | DE LA CRUZ Eden | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 9% | |
| 17 | YU Lauren C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 24% | 3% |
| 18 | EYER Hailey M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 8% |
| 19 | PEVZNER Victoria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 62% |
| 20 | SHEN Sophia H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% |
| 21 | WANG Chloe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% | 8% |
| 22 | CHEN Jessie S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 14% |
| 23 | HUANG Natalie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
| 24 | SHA Yi Ling | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% | 4% |
| 25 | MI Anning | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 26 | SEO Irene Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 37% | 5% |
| 27 | WONG Sophia M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 41% | 8% |
| 28 | CHO Rebecca H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 48% | 9% |
| 29 | ORVANANOS Anice | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 29% | 4% |
| 30 | YU Jaime L. | 100% | 99% | 81% | 35% | 6% | - | |
| 31 | SIMONOV Dasha | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 21% | 2% | |
| 32 | MI Aileen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 39% | 6% | - |
| 33 | TOBIN Brean | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 34 | LENZ Zoe N. | 100% | 85% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | VOITENKO AGATA | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 36 | KOKES Gwendolen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 37 | LEE Lavender | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 40% | 7% |
| 38 | YAO Ada | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% | 1% |
| 39 | WILLIS Fletcher L. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 8% | - |
| 40 | YU Nicole J. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 41 | LIN Zhi tong | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 6% |
| 42 | WU Celine | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 42 | SOLDATOVA Maria | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 7% | - |
| 44 | WANG Jasmine | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 7% | - |
| 45 | LIU Sophia | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 46 | KULKARNI Sohah A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 3% |
| 47 | LIU Angel(Daying) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 20% | 2% |
| 48 | RASO Olivia | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 49 | SONG Yuqiao | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 50 | CHOW Annabelle | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 51 | GOLBIN Ariella J. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 52 | ZHENG Julie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 34% | 7% | - |
| 53 | CHEN Jasmine | 100% | 99% | 84% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 54 | ROY Layla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | 26% | 3% |
| 55 | LEE Kaitlyn | 100% | 89% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 56 | HSIEH Sabrina | 100% | 40% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 57 | FELLUS Talia E. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 58 | XIANG Emma | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% | |
| 59 | CHENG Angelina | 100% | 77% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 60 | FU Qihan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 61 | PAULUS Isabella | 100% | 93% | 56% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 62 | CHARALEL Jessica | 100% | 92% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 63 | SHMAY Anastasia | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 64 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 100% | 58% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 65 | MANIKTALA Prisha | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 66 | HOU Wendong | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 67 | MARKOVSKY Nina | 100% | 99% | 83% | 37% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 68 | LIN Victoria T. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 69 | LEE Samantha X. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 70 | HSIEH Rebecca | 100% | 93% | 60% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 71 | JIANG Claire | 100% | 98% | 77% | 27% | 4% | - | - |
| 72 | LEE Carina | 100% | 76% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 73 | AO Alyssa | 100% | 95% | 56% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 74 | RICHARD Dominique | 100% | 95% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 75 | ZHOU Sophia | 100% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 76 | MARTIRE Alessandra | 100% | 89% | 39% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 77 | LEVY Avery | 100% | 74% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 78 | DONG TianTian | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 79 | RICHARD Clara | 100% | 94% | 63% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 80 | KIM Raiden | 100% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 81 | LAPPER Whitney P. | 100% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 82 | MATOS Lívia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 16% |
| 83 | NAIR Supriya | 100% | 98% | 80% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 84 | KIES Daniela | 100% | 83% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 85 | LEE DAYOUNG | 100% | 26% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 86 | KUTTIKAT Sanjana | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 87 | SHAH Aanya | 100% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 88 | ZHOU huiqi | 100% | 32% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 89 | WANG Rachael | 100% | 85% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.