Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MARX Jackson L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 42% |
2 | LI Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% | 7% |
3 | XU Andy P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% |
3 | LIU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 25% |
5 | WONG Jackson | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
6 | CHENG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 33% | 4% | |
7 | BOBROW Silas | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 1% | |
8 | YU Jason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% | |
9 | XU Jia Bao (Bowen) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 71% |
10 | LIU Derek | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% | |
11 | SHEN Mingxuan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 40% | 7% |
12 | CHUNG Ethan Sheng Xuan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% | |
13 | WONG Jacob W. | 100% | 100% | 89% | 56% | 19% | 2% | |
14 | SHIM Peter S. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
15 | GULCHIN Mark | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 39% | 5% |
16 | GHEDINI Luca | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
17 | KOKES William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% | |
18 | CHEN Kyle P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% |
19 | TAN Aidan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 16% | 1% |
20 | ONIK Ari N. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 8% | - |
20 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
22 | LEE Brendan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 20% | 3% | |
23 | YAO Bradley | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
24 | TOOMRE Luca | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - |
25 | TANG Alexander L. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% | |
26 | RAJ Jay | 100% | 100% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 2% | |
27 | GERRISH William | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 8% | - |
28 | ZHANG Raphael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 16% |
29 | CHA James | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | - |
30 | ZENG Rick | 100% | 83% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
31 | HE Yuxiang | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 34% | 5% | |
32 | SIMONOV Timofey | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 8% | |
33 | MAO Lucas | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
34 | LI Bradley | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
35 | YU ZiRun (Kinton) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 58% | 25% | 5% |
36 | ZHANG Lucas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
37 | YEVDAYEV Tamir | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
38 | PEARL Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 4% |
39 | TANG Royce | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
40 | HUANG Christopher | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% | |
41 | TOOMRE Kai | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
42 | MANIKTALA Suvir | 100% | 95% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
43 | BANG Sian | 100% | 58% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
44 | NORMILE Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 28% | 3% |
45 | JIANG Matthew | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
46 | LIU Robert | 100% | 68% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
47 | PHAM Kian | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
48 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 5% | - |
49 | HONG Logan | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | |
50 | LONGENBACH Matiuss | 100% | 96% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
51 | DONG Joshua | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
52 | LEE Daniel | 100% | 98% | 74% | 34% | 7% | 1% | |
53 | MARTIRE Luca | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
54 | KARPESHOV Maddox | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
55 | POLEBOYINA Amrit | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - |
56 | CHEN Thomas | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
57 | CASSESE Tyler | 100% | 96% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
58 | LIN Johnson | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 7% | 1% | |
59 | MCALLISTER thomas | 100% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | |
60 | MCLENDON Dario | 100% | 78% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
61 | LAU Kyrus | 100% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 3% | - | |
62 | SICAT Justin | 100% | 89% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | |
63 | YU William | 100% | 97% | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - |
64 | SHAW Spencer | 100% | 93% | 64% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
65 | LIN Wilson | 100% | 97% | 74% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - |
66 | WANG Ralph | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.