Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | - | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 15% |
| 2 | LU Elaine | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 17% |
| 3 | KIM Marley I. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 22% | |
| 3 | KRASTEV Minna | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 30% |
| 5 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 42% | 29% | |
| 6 | NATH Trisha | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 38% | |
| 7 | GHAYALOD reya | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 38% | 49% |
| 8 | XIAO julie | - | 6% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 9 | LEE Hannah | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% | |
| 10 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 4% |
| 11 | HE Lizbeth | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 37% | |
| 12 | XU Emily T. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 30% | |
| 13 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | - | 4% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% | |
| 14 | KHAN Alissa | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | |
| 15 | FESTA Carina | - | 4% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 6% | |
| 16 | JEONG Katie | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 17 | WU Helen | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | |
| 18 | MONTORIO Lily M. | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 19 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
| 20 | SO Catelyn | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 27% |
| 21 | XU ALINA | 16% | 35% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 22 | ZHANG Sophie | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 23 | WU Yuwei | 1% | 5% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 24 | TSUI Natalie | - | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 33% | 7% |
| 25 | WEI JoyAnn | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 26 | YOUNG Audrey | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
| 27 | LIU Sophie | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 4% | |
| 28 | YAN Lena | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 29 | DENG Brooke | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% | |
| 30 | ELNATAN Mica A. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 3% | |
| 31 | MURRAY Audrey A. | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
| 32 | RADULOVIC Ruth | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 33 | DAI Olivia | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 34 | HUANG Rachael | - | - | 6% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 5% |
| 35 | CHEN Kevy | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 5% | |
| 36 | MCKEE Brynnley | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | |
| 37 | BUSH Divina | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
| 38 | CHOU Amy R. | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 39 | KAPLAN Gabriela | 11% | 38% | 37% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | CHIARELLI Valentina | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 41 | HITOMI Nadya | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
| 42 | ALTIRS Kate | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
| 43 | YU Abriella R. | 25% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | SCHAIBLE Sofia L. | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 45 | BONFILI Clara | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 5% | |
| 46 | MEDVINSKY Alexandra | 14% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | |
| 47 | RANDALL-COLLINS Shea M. | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 48 | TING Sydney | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 49 | MAKLIN Sofia | - | 2% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
| 50 | GUVEN Grace | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 51 | BAROUCH Susanna | 3% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
| 52 | ZHENG Valentina | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 2% | |
| 52 | LAGOON Miriam | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 54 | KNOBEL Sophia | 30% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 55 | SRINATH Lyra A. | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | CHO Audrey | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 57 | STONE Coral | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 58 | BUSH Bethany | 1% | 12% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 59 | PILAT Izabela | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 60 | ZHENG Annabelle | 44% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 61 | SHUM Madyson | 22% | 51% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 62 | KALINICHENKO Yekaterina | 10% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 63 | KHOST Maeve | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | |
| 64 | SHUMAKIN Alisa | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 65 | CHO-SAYEGH Emily | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 66 | NEWMAN Winnie | 5% | 26% | 43% | 23% | 3% | - | |
| 67 | PROZUMENT Elizabeth | 47% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 68 | LOO Kaitlyn | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | |
| 69 | LEE Tammy | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 70 | MYAT Chloe | 3% | 14% | 31% | 31% | 17% | 4% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.