Canlan Sports Libertyville - Libertyville, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HOROWITZ Shuli | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 33% | 60% |
| 2 | HU Sophie | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 54% |
| 3 | HOM Avery | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% |
| 3 | LI Christina | - | - | 6% | 25% | 43% | 26% | |
| 5 | LAI Miranda | - | - | - | 3% | 21% | 47% | 30% |
| 6 | YANG Olivia | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 39% | 23% |
| 7 | ZHANG Priscilla | - | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% |
| 8 | RIVERA Leahy | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 36% | |
| 9 | ZHENG Annalyn | - | - | - | 5% | 36% | 53% | 6% |
| 10 | HUANG Natalie | - | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 43% | 17% |
| 11 | DENG Claire | - | - | 4% | 17% | 37% | 35% | 7% |
| 12 | ZHU Alivia | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 4% |
| 13 | HO Peyton | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% | |
| 14 | DHALIWAL Seerat | - | - | 1% | 16% | 51% | 29% | 3% |
| 15 | SALMI-BYDALEK Ada | - | - | 2% | 11% | 35% | 41% | 11% |
| 16 | YOUM Amelia | 1% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
| 17 | NWODO Naila | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 39% |
| 18 | ZHANG Selina | - | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 37% | 10% |
| 19 | KIM Yuna | - | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 35% | 9% |
| 20 | ZELLER CARBONE Francesca | - | - | - | - | 4% | 26% | 70% |
| 21 | SUN Nicole | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 46% | 21% | |
| 22 | LIN Avery | - | 3% | 15% | 30% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 23 | CHAN Ella | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 44% | 39% |
| 24 | HEWITT Madison | 3% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 25 | SHEN Gloria | - | 3% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 7% | |
| 26 | GONZALEZ Lauren | 15% | 47% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | ZOLDAN Nolabelle | 1% | 9% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 3% | |
| 28 | MA Sophia | - | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 30% | 7% |
| 29 | LIU Bella | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 30 | KASHUBA Mila | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 20% | 2% |
| 31 | CHAN Chloe | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 32 | SHUSTA Lily | - | 7% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% | |
| 33 | JOESUF Thea | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 34 | BELL Blake | 1% | 10% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 35 | JOESUF Aurielle | - | 4% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 36 | KLIVANS Gwyneth | 3% | 17% | 39% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 37 | KHANAL Sarah | 1% | 9% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 38 | SON Ayoung | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 33% | |
| 39 | FAROOQI Eliora | 6% | 33% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 40 | KIM Audrey | 7% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 41 | PARANJAPE Ojasvi | 1% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 17% | 2% | |
| 42 | CHO Karis | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 48% | 25% |
| 43 | SAVIOZ Naomi | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 44 | ZHU Claire | 2% | 18% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 45 | KU Amanda | 12% | 48% | 33% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 46 | DEJOY Leilah | 10% | 35% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 47 | ZHANG Katie Q. | - | 4% | 26% | 50% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 48 | HUANG Emma | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% |
| 49 | ELLISON Ingrid | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 50 | LIU Sophia | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 51 | HUANG Rosalyn | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 52 | KO Adeline | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 53 | MA Sophie | 20% | 41% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | SOUTO Catalina | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 55 | D'MELLO Ariella | 1% | 15% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 56 | OS Danielle | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 9% | |
| 57 | LAI Olivia | 57% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 58 | FAN Melody | 6% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 59 | LIU Jocelyn | 8% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 60 | SHAW Isobel | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 61 | TUNG Alison | 31% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 62 | XU Elaina | 3% | 27% | 48% | 19% | 2% | - | - |
| 63 | LIU Doris | 29% | 44% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 64 | LALONDE Beatrice | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 65 | CHO Yuna | 6% | 41% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 66 | KANASZ Peyton | 15% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 67 | KAGAN Natalie | 11% | 36% | 38% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
| 68 | BADER Mia | 34% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 69 | CHIN Riley | 18% | 42% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 70 | TEOH Kaylee | 57% | 36% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 71 | HWANG Carolina | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 72 | BALTATU Emily | 63% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 73 | DALY Layla | 75% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 74 | DALY Ava | 59% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.