Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | SATHYANATH Kailing | D V V V V V | V V V V V V | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
2 | NI Sharon | V V V V V | V V V V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
3 | PRIEUR Lauren | V V V V D V | V V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
3 | ATLURI Sara V. | D V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
5 | MIKA Veronica | V V V V V D | V V V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
6 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | V V D V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
7 | ROMAGNOLI Isabella | V D V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
8 | WEBER Juliana I. | D V D V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
9 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
9 | ENGELMAN Madeline A. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
11 | GORMAN Victoria M. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
12 | KOO Samantha | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
12 | TAO Hannah J. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
14 | YANG Ashley M. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
15 | HILD Nisha | V D D V D V | V V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
16 | PAUL Lila | D V D D V V | V V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
17 | CARVALHO Isabela A. | V V V V V V | V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
18 | SHOMAN Jenna | V V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
19 | CHEN Xinyan | V V V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
20 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | D V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
21 | KRASTEV Minna | V V D V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
22 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | V V V V D D | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
23 | LIAO Siwen | V D V V D V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
24 | SOURIMTO Valeria | V V V D D V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
25 | NATHANSON Sammy E. | V D V D V V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
26 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | D V V D V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
27 | HASSANEIN Toqa | V V D V V D | V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
28 | OWENS Celine A. | V V V D D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
29 | LU Amy | D D V V V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
30 | LI Amanda C. | D V V V D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
31 | VADASZ Ibla P. | V V D D V D | V V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
32 | CHANG Emily | D V V D V D | V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
33 | KRYLOVA Valery | V V D V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
34 | FAY Zoe A. | V V D D V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
35 | DUCKETT Madison | D V D V V V | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
36 | XIKES Katherine E. | D D V V V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
37 | CRUZ Sonia | V V V D V D | D | 1.5 | 4 | +2.5 |
38 | ALCEBAR Kayla | D V V V V D | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
38 | IQBAL Sulphia | D V V V V D | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
40 | WANG Jianning | V D D V V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
41 | SINHA Anika | V V V D D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
42 | LU Elaine | V D D V D V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
43 | XU Emily T. | D V V D V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
44 | LEE Sophia | V D D D V V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
45 | WEI Vivian W. | V D V V D D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
46 | GIRARDI Aemilia | V D V V D D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
47 | YU Melinda | V V D D D V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
48 | HE Lizbeth | D V D V D V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
49 | RIZKALA Joanna | D D V V D | V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
50 | NG Sarah W. | V D V D D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
51 | GRAFF Sophie | D D V V D D | V D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
52 | DEPEW Charlotte R. | V V D D D D | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
53 | HESSLER Hope L. | D D D V D V | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
54 | YUAN Greta | D V D D D V | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
55 | CHEN Xiaohan | D D V V D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
56 | SIMONIAN Olivia A. | V D V D D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
57 | PATNAIK Nastassia | V D D V D D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
58 | YI Felicia | D D D D V V | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
59 | CHEN Ashley | D D D D V V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
60 | MADA Skye | D V D D D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
61 | JAVERI Amaya | D D D D D V | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
62 | LIGH Karis | V D D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
63 | REN Xinling | D V D D D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
64 | DANK Dina | D D D D D | V D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
65 | LI Angela | V V D D V D | D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
66 | ZHIZHIN Jeanette | D D D V V V | D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
67 | HAQ Nylah | V D V D V D | D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
68 | OGANEZOVA Valerie | V D D V D V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
69 | DAVIS Jordan | D V D V D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
70 | OBRADOVIC Ana | D D V D V D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
71 | SHIH Christina | D V V D D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
72 | COHEN Charlotte | D D D V D V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
73 | KOTSEN Ava L. | D D D D V | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
74 | NAYAK Anika | D V D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
75 | XU JENNY | D D D D V | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
76 | ILYIN Polina | D D D D D V | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
77 | HE Xi | D D D D D V | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
78 | BHOGAL Sukhleen | D V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
79 | LEUNG Ashlyn K. | D D D V D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
79 | HORMEL Molly | V D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
81 | SULLIVAN Caroline | D D V D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
82 | JENKINS Scotland | D D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
83 | YAN Ava | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
84 | MESSICK Maya | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
85 | CHARLES Caitlin | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
86 | ZENG Megan | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
86 | FEO ZAKHAROVA Isabella | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
88 | WAIBEL Sophie | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.