Canlan Sports Libertyville - Libertyville, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHENG Annalyn | - | - | - | - | 2% | 19% | 80% |
| 2 | ZHU Alivia | - | - | 1% | 9% | 43% | 48% | |
| 3 | HO Peyton | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 55% |
| 3 | SON Ayoung | - | - | - | - | 2% | 24% | 74% |
| 5 | ZHU Claire | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 2% |
| 6 | LIN Avery | - | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 15% |
| 7 | GONZALEZ Lauren | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 29% | 3% |
| 8 | HUANG Emma | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 9 | ZHANG Selina | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 37% |
| 10 | KASHUBA Mila | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 11 | KIM Yuna | - | - | 2% | 20% | 52% | 26% | |
| 12 | KIM Audrey | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 31% | 3% |
| 13 | WEN Lillian | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 14 | LEE Eun-Hae | - | 7% | 30% | 46% | 16% | 1% | |
| 15 | KLIVANS Gwyneth | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 16 | ZHANG Katie Q. | 3% | 13% | 28% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 17 | ELLISON Ingrid | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 15% |
| 18 | JIANG Mujing | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | < 1% |
| 19 | SAVIOZ Naomi | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 2% |
| 20 | JOESUF Thea | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 9% |
| 21 | LIU Sophia | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 5% |
| 22 | KO Adeline | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 23 | GONZALEZ Alexandra | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 24 | DEJOY Leilah | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 26% | 11% | 2% |
| 25 | KHANAL Sarah | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 26 | SHI Cathy | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 27 | FAROOQI Eliora | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 28 | HOLSTAD Anneliese | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 29 | JONES Parker | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 4% |
| 30 | HO Avery | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 31 | SANCHEZ-BOROVSKAYA Snezhana | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | XU Scarlett | 8% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 33 | ZHANG Priscilla | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
| 34 | MA Sophia | - | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 39% | 23% |
| 35 | LALONDE Beatrice | 1% | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 36 | TUNG Alison | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 37 | HWANG Carolina | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 38 | FANG Savannah | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 39 | MA Annabella | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | - | - |
| 40 | XU Elaina | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 41 | CHO Yuna | 6% | 36% | 42% | 14% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | HEWITT Madison | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 43 | CHAN Chloe | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 44 | LIU Doris | 12% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 45 | KANASZ Peyton | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 46 | LIU Jocelyn | 11% | 30% | 33% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 47 | BADER Mia | 5% | 33% | 44% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 48 | FANG Yining | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 49 | LAI Olivia | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 50 | TEOH Kaylee | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | LOPUS Marlena | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 52 | LI Claire | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 53 | DAI Claire | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 54 | CHIN Riley | 18% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | CABBINESS CLAIRE | 33% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 56 | ROLKOWSKI Mia | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 57 | KAGAN Natalie | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 58 | LIU Mina | 15% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 59 | LI Ivy | 64% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 60 | CURRIER-BLAGG Bryn | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 61 | TAKAHASHI Rio | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 62 | RAJ Trisha | < 1% | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.